User talk:Tschild

Nobody gave you a welcome yet, a bit late, but here you go: Welcome!

Hello, Tschild, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! And thank you for nominating Adolph Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenberdorf for deletion! Kusma (討論) 15:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DMOZ ELs

I see that you've been adding DMOZ external links to articles. In general, I think these should be avoided in wikipedia given the nature of DMOZ. Please let me know if this has been discussed before and how I might find such discussions. Thanks. --Ronz 16:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reformatted (not added) a number of existing external links to ODP categories using Template:dmoz which most of the ODP links already use. Links to appropriate web directory categories are specifically mentioned in WP:EL#Links_to_be_considered, so the nature of the Open Directory would recommend rather than preclude such a link (the ODP category in question needs to have enough content, of course.) Tschild 17:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. That's fine. I removed it from Scientific_visualization, which needs some serious EL cleanup as is. I can't recall ever seeing another dmoz link, but I'll take them case by case from now on. Thanks again. --Ronz 20:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you the ISBN guy?

Are you by any chance Tomas Schild of isbn-check.com? If so I've a couple of questions! Thanks, EdJohnston

Yes, I am Tschild 17:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, glad you're here! You may be aware that our Special:booksources page invokes isbn-check.de, if the reader wants to do a validity check. We are looking at what might be needed to support ISBN-13s on Wikipedia. The current version of your checker only does ISBN-10. Do you have any advice for us? Thanks. EdJohnston 21:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on supporting ISBN-13 on isbn.check.com/.de some time next week - in any case before the end of the year when ISBN-10 become invalid. Something to do over the holidays ;) Tschild 22:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again Tom (we have jsut had an email exchange to the same effect). Rich Farmbrough, 10:52 20 December 2006 (GMT).

I have now implemented ISBN-13 testing (OK/not OK) but there are still some extensions to be done (Esperanto version not yet updated; ISBN-13 for an ISBN-10; ISBN-10 for a 978... ISBN-13) Tschild 01:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Complex systems

Thank you for your contribution to the complex system article in the past. Currently there is a Call for Deletion for the associated Category:Complex systems covering this interdisplinary scientific field. If you would like to contribute to the discussion, you would be very welcome. Please do this soon if possible since the discussion period is very short. Thank you for your interest if you can contribute. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 14:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

books-by-isbn

Many months ago your site, http://www.books-by-isbn.com/, was placed on the Spam blacklist, for reasons that didn't seem to make much sense. Repeatedly, different editors tried to get the decision reversed; at last, we have succeeded. You may find the linked discussion useful, to help you avoid accidentally doing something that gets you on the list, and to help deal with it if it happens.

My request was specific to the one site; others, like isbn-check.com, may still be blacklisted. Note that organizations share lists, so prohibition here propagates outside Wikipedia and other MediaWiki sites. --KSmrq^T 21:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KSmrq - thanks for the information (and for requesting that removal). I wasn't aware of my site being blacklisted but now I understand why I could not edit the page for books-by-isbn.com over at aboutus.org - apparently that site uses not only the MediaWiki software but also the MediaWiki blacklist. Tschild 17:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: found discussion leading to removal at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2007/10#books-by-isbn.com Tschild (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dmoz

Hello. I see your vote at the Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_15#Template:Dmoz. Can you vote ({{keep}} or {{Удалить}}) on page — ru:Википедия:К_удалению/5_февраля_2008#.D0.A8.D0.B0.D0.B1.D0.BB.D0.BE.D0.BD:Dmoz

Best regards, nejron (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'd need to justify my vote there, and I cannot do that in Russian. The vote does seem to go towards 'keep' anyway. Thank you for the heads-up, though. Tschild (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your attention. Best regards, nejron (talk) 15:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Open Directory Project (DMOZ) Links

The DMOZ search template (Dmoz2) is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. I'm sending you this notice because of your previous participation in the TfD discussion for the DMOZ category template. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2. Thank you. Qazin (talk) 07:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felicia Langer

I liked your edits! Thnx as well for having me looking up Lord Mayor. BR --Polentario (talk) 21:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Marwa El-Sherbini

		WikiMedal for Janitorial Services
		Thank you kindly for your excellent effort of maintaining this article. Mootros (talk) 12:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Dear Tschild, thank you again for your persistent effort! I think, it's great.

I've noticed that in the last Spiegel article the assailant is actually called Alexander rather than Alex. I have to say, I'm not too happy with the current use of "Alex W." throughout the text. I guess it must be a German style. The British convention for contraction (cf. abbreviation) is not to use a dot. I would like to consistently use (both) the following Alexander W and W (sic [italic]]). What do you think? Yours, Mootros (talk) 11:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alex W. is a German style (and I believe also one possible British style as it's an abbreviation not a contraction, being a single letter). You can change it if you consider it correct - it would look a bit strange to me, I must confess. The one Russian-language source on the case (Russian Newsweek) that I have looked up says Aleks not Aleksandr btw. It will probably become moot in a few weeks as when the defendant is named in open court the international (but not the German) press will report his full name and some international Wikipedian (not me - I'll abide by the German use but not revert others' addition) will insert the full name. Tschild (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick reply. Have a look here and here. Btw, a single letter can be both abbreviation or contraction. I see your point about the international issue. Probeably best just to leave it for the time being than. Mootros (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New message

Hello, Tschild. You have new messages at Talk:Death_of_Marwa_El-Sherbini#Note_on_site_http:.2F.2Fwww.marwaelsherbiny.co.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi

Dear Tschild, Happy New Year and happy writing. Unfortunately, I've missed the GA review as I was on a Sabbatical at the time. I've aleady made some changes following the comments and will rewrite the lead at some stage over the next few days. I was wondering about this:

"This was denied by a separate panel that had ruled on this motion." could do with a CITE

I think you translated this one. Would you remember where the "separate pannel" came from? Mootros (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Murder of Marwa El-Sherbini

Dear Tschild,

The article Murder of Marwa El-Sherbini is currently GA reviewed (2nd time, after I missed the first one) and placed on hold. I've done most of the suggested changes. Perhaps if you have some time --within the next days-- you couldlook at the remaining issues in section 2 on "factually accurate and verifiable". Just a few quotes and some general checks on my changes today. Many thanks. I'm sure it should be fine to get this through the GA. Yours, Mootros (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done All done. ~~

EU regulations: Practising_law_in_Germany

Hi again,

You might be interested and able to help, there is a question here: Talk:Murder_of_Marwa_El-Sherbini#Note_5:_Practising_law_in_Germany

Many thanks, Mootros (talk) 10:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FA candidate Murder of Marwa El-Sherbini

You may like to comment regarding this featured article candidate: Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Murder_of_Marwa_El-Sherbini Mootros (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars!

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For being a hard worker! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		For doing minor, but still essential edits! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit on Dorothy Must Die and saw that you do a lot of minor edits along with major edits. Editors that make the minor edits that you do are often overlooked (although I see someone gave you a well-deserved Janitor barnstar!) so I just wanted to do something nice! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tschild. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tschild. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tschild. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited An Leabhar Mòr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tschild. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]