User talk:TryMe99

Test.

TryMe99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TryMe99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Angelique Fawcette and Unbelievable!!!!!) for undisclosed paid editing and editing with a conflict of interest, in violation of Wikipedia policy. You are still able to edit other pages, and suggest edits by using the talk page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TryMe99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here TryMe99 (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please do not make personal attacks on Wikipedia. This includes unsubstantiated accusations against other editors. — Newslinger talk 05:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I spoke with a User at the Oversight Committee by the name of PrimeFac today via email. PrimeFac was nice and factual and sent me links as far as how to work within Wikipedia. I was informed last night that a page that contained my name was removed within Wikipedia. I then created a new account yesterday bringing this mentioned page with my name on it back up. My assistant also wrote an "email only" to Wikipedia but "did not" make "any" edits (paid, non-paid or otherwise) within the system, which is good becasue I found out through PrimeFac that this is against Wikipedia guidelines. As there is the existence of Women In Red this mentioned page take-down did appear to be a racist and / or sexist act, it is never acceptable to have a page removed or to be indefinitely blocked due to skin color, my race or my gender, it is not good or fun and the Hell that the world is facing today due to race is deeply indicative of this statement. Now I am being blocked for responding and following directions and updating the page that contains my name with the "correct" information. PrimeFac had assured me that this action was not racist or sexist, I believed PrimeFac, but now? I am also dealing with a cyber-crime against my name via the internet, and I now believe that there may be individuals associated with this mentioned party who may be attacking my name and facts in regards to my name via Wikipedia. Wikipedia should be a factual environment not non-factual. Now ST47, who I am certain is a Star Trek fan and who is upset that I am standing up for Nichelle Nichols rights as an Elder Abuse victim has indefinitely blocked me. This is wrong, malicious and unfair. I am making the request to be unblocked by Wikipedia. I believe ST47 is likely working with those who are cyber attacking me,(a cyber-crime), via the internet, in which not as a threat but as fact I have hired a Digital Forensics Detective to investigate and to catch the perpetrators working to bring my name harm. I respect companies and I respect Wikipedia but as we all live on this planet we all should have and deserve the same rights, as all have, skin color, gender, affiliation, personal beliefs should not come into question when placing a Wikipedia page and humbly I am new to this site. PrimeFac shared some links with me in which I am grateful for, I did not go against your policies and did not pay my assistant to edit, she only sent an email in which I did not know was wrong for her to do. But again this is not making an edit. And as Wikipedia is a company and as society within itself, we still live in our perspective countries and are still held to the rules and the laws of the land ultimately, so without threat but instead assurance that I will stand up for myself, I ask that the Oversight Committee will unblock me as I am new here. I have added "correct and factual information", and sadly I do not trust ST47 to not try and block me again or Onel5969 to take-down a page of a hard working, history making Black African American Woman. When people intentionally harm others because a Forum or company allows them to do so it is wrong and the power is then given to them to do the same harm to others, many others. Thank you for your time and consideration. TryMe99 (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)TryMe99[reply]

Wait. You are accusing ST47 of being a Star Trek fan who is in cahoots with people who harass other people on the internet. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @TryMe99: You can't edit the article about yourself / your employer / whatever. You're welcome to edit anything with which you don't have a conflict of interest, or, use the talk page of the article to suggest changes. ST47 (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 05:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]