User talk:Truthtrue

Tekken 7

Before making any edits, let's discuss this on the talk page, see what others think otherwise this will get us both blocked. Besides which Tekkenpedia does not come under video game reliable sources or reliable sources in general. Read Wikipedia policies. As for your argument that Tekkenpedia is as reliable as Wikipedia, Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source as a general rule of thumb--Tærkast (Discuss) 15:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will report you if you refuse to discuss the changes.--Tærkast (Discuss) 19:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tekken 7 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Tærkast (Discuss) 19:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, nervous. First of all, feel free to make it. We already have discussed about Tekken 7. You are talking about discuss, but we don't need to argue. Tekkenpedia is a community of thousand of true Tekken fans, so the most people thinks like me. It is a matter of common sense. Take it easy, because you have no arguments.

Remember:

Just as I said before, it is missing main characters and stages, many bugs are being repaired till today (check out Tekkenpedia for bugs and updates after the release).

There are 18 stages from Tekken 6, on Tekken 7 there are only 8 stages.

Nina Williams is a main character who are present in all Tekken series and not released yet on Tekken 7.

Also, the game have exactly the same stages, from the last year 2014, so calling Tekken 7 a "full release" game is absurd and it doesn't make sense.

"Location Test" is about "Testing", which means it is a Beta Testing Game.

Tekkenpedia is nothing more than a fan based Wikia, it does not constitute a reliable source. You refuse to acknowledge anything. --Tærkast (Discuss) 20:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, I forget to mention:

http://www.readersgambit.com/tekken-7-hits-arcades/ (Tekken 7 Beta Hits Arcades) The same stages from the last year.

You are refusing, not me. Just show your arguments.

Where is the discussion on Wikipedia that you allude to about the status of Tekken 7? —C.Fred (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more proof:

Tekken 7 bug: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVIYNCTnGqw

I think no one are really interested on discuss this article.

The user TaerkastUA is always rude, he is like a child in his points trying to offend and he doesn't have arguments about the game.

And this discussion is not personal, it is just about if a game, is a beta game!

C.Fred, can you (please) show your opinion if this game is beta or not? So why back to the old version? Why don't change the article to a neutral view of this discussion?

All modifications since the "pseudofull" release:

30 April The game has been updated once again, from E10 to F08. The F08 version balances out the cast's attacks, as well as changing some of their move properties. Some glitches and visual bugs were also fixed in the process.

12 May Yoshimitsu has been added into the cast.

19 May Jack-7 is added to the cast.

2 June Kazumi Mishima is added to the playable cast.

4 June G15 update is made. Aside from fixing more bugs, and balancing issues, more customization items have been added. It was also now possible to form teams.

And so on...Truthtrue (talk) 03:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the talk page. You don't seem to care what other people think, but it's important to develop a consensus if you so believe that you are right.

I posted there. You're wrong, I want see arguments, no one showed his arguments. I am the only who wants to talk about it. Truthtrue (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Truthtrue, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Truthtrue, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Tekken 7

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tekken 7, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truthtrue reported by User:Krystaleen (Result: ). Thank you. Krystaleen 17:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're at four reverts in the past hour, not just 3 in 24 hours. I strongly suggest you undo your last revert and take the matter to the talk page. Otherwise, your account will be blocked (assuming another administrator doesn't decide to block your account right now). —C.Fred (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

It looks like this has been an ongoing issue with you for almost a year, and honestly, I can't believe you haven't found yourself blocked more times over it. This needs to stop.

Do not continually make an edit that is clearly disputed by others. You need to discuss on talk pages, and only make changes unless there is a clear consensus to do so. As far as I can tell, I haven't seen a single person support your proposal to define the Tekken 7 game as a beta in the opening sentence of the article, while there have been countless people oppose it, between the June discussion, the January discussion, and the page's edit history in edit summaries,
Do not use anonymous IP's to continue your edit warring either. That is not acceptable.

If you do either of these again, you'll be blocked from editing again. Sergecross73 msg me 12:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 1 week. Sergecross73 msg me 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 1 month, because your first action after returning from your block, was to make the same edit, with consensus, discussion, or even an edit summary. Sergecross73 msg me 22:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A note - block evasion will extend your block further. Please don't. Sergecross73 msg me 14:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]