User talk:Truthteller30000
September 2024
[edit]Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of the oldest mosques. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Truthteller30000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of the oldest mosques, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of the oldest mosques was changed by Truthteller30000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870015 on 2024-09-17T01:01:17+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)- I am literally correcting something that is factual. I am here to share real information. Palestine is not a country and even when those mosques were established those areas where not considered Palestine. Al-Aqsa is literally in Israel's territory. To write that its under Palestinian territory is literally misinformation. Which is literally the Holiest Jewish site in Judaism. Same situation with Haram al-Sharif and Al-Qibli Mosque. Ibrahimi Mosque is also in Israel's territory. It is literally a Cave of the Patriarchs, a Jewish religious site. You are literally erasing Israeli and Jewish identity. You are the one blocking real information for being shared.
- Wiki itself defines these places as not being Palestinian. Truthteller30000 (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)