User talk:Truthhurts34

Concerning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page overlong presentation of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexei_Navalny

It is dismaying that this news item remains on the Wikipedia top page for as long as it currently has, upwards of a week. This is no longer news, and my suspicion is that outside forces for whom agitprop using Navalny is valuable, are guiding it to remain in the Wikipedia News. Truthhurts34 (talk) 12:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Ehud Olmert. Thank you. Rami R 10:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Longue durée, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 01:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Truthhurts34! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, According to Wikipedia the President of Russia is not part of the government. Is this not nonsense?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sexual violence in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing. Prolog (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Prolog (talk) 21:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]