User talk:Truthbringer1

Truthbringer1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Truthbringer1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrm7171. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Your recent editing history at Elton Mayo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Has iss246 been warned of this too. He was recently blocked for edit warring.Truthbringer1 (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

Hi. I've reopened the active sockpuppetry investigation involving you (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrm7171). You're certainly free to comment further on the case, but this time, it is essential that you confine your remarks solely and exclusively to the question of whether you are, or are not, the same person as Mrm7171. Any discussion of alleged content disputes, edit warring, or vandalism are out of order on an SPI page — the only legitimate issue for discussion in an SPI is whether or not sockpuppetry is occurring. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 15:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]