User talk:Truthbearer1
Blocked
[edit]I read all the reasons stated for the initial blocking of this POPULAR artist's article creation. Alleged reason was not discrimination against transgender rock artists, but, "lack of sources." I added 8 sources.
 | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Foulball (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |
Elockid (Talk) 23:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
It appears there is a conspiracy to block ALL fans of this band and all friends of this band, and claim they are all "foulball," who merely tried to create an article on said band, and was insulted for so doing by bigots at wikipedia who hate transgenders and jokes as so in the chat log. We added multiple sources due to the fact the abusing libelous blockers of this article claimed there are no legitimate sources and that, "the artist" wrote all the links, etc etc LOL. THE ARTICLE IS LEGIT. THE CENSORSHIP AND BIGOTRY ARE NOT. MORE FANS TO FOLLOW.
{{hangon}} This article is different from the first as it addresses the reasoning behind deleting the first article: no sources. This article clearly has many more sources listed. If this is a factual encyclopedia it should function as one.
{{hangon}} This article addresses the prior concern of less sources by adding many more. If this is a fact based encyclopedia it should act as one.
{{hangon}}
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bralalalalarockstar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wolfnix • Talk • 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)