User talk:TruthSeeker123

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Burn Notice, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Fyrefly (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burn Notice. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmargi (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate your message regarding your source, but telling individual editors you got information from one of the cast does not meet the minimum standard for reliable sourcing, no will information you claim to have gotten from a cast member ever be acceptable content. Please read up on how to source your contributions before you edit again. Please also be aware of the WP:3RR rule, which you are perilously close to violating. --Drmargi (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burn Notice, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Burn Notice was changed by TruthSeeker123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860539 on 2011-12-23T20:18:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Burn Notice edits

Thank you for responding on my talk page, and yes I do read responses. I actually have only removed your edit once so far, but other editors are also trying to maintain the quality of the article and removing it. Please stop re-adding the season six info until we resolve this. If you have a reliable source, such as an interview with Bruce Campbell, please include this reference in your edit, so that it does not seem as though you made this information up on your own. When editing, you'll notice that there is a 'Cite' button, which should make it easy to add a reference. If you have any questions, I'll be glad to help. -- Fyrefly (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --Drmargi (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Can you please read what I wrote to you on your Wiki Page? Thanks.

I did read it, and responded to it. You need to read what we're telling you about reliable sources. Burn Notice is out of production right now. They haven't begun writing Season Six, so there's no possible way you could have so detailed a summary of a two-episode arc this far in advance. Moreover, the actors are rarely allowed to talk much about upcoming plot. You must have misunderstood BC; he might have been talking about a story he'd like to see them do, or something similar. None of which matters, because you have to have a reliable, verifiable secondary source that supports the content you're adding. Your word isn't sufficient. Fyrefly has offered to help you cite a source; you might want to work with him/her. --Drmargi (talk) 20:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I see your point but I was there. I guess the pilot and he confirm it. Bruce Campbell was blown away that I knew so much. He even ask me how I find out about it. I told him a lucky guess. If you are all thinking that I am making stuff up, why should I even waste my time trying to help Wikipedia? Thanks for your time.

It does not matter if he told you this or not, or even if we believe you or not. The fact is that in order for you to add it to the article Wikipedia policy requires that you give a reliable source for this information. No amount of debating will change this fact. -- Fyrefly (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry you're disappointed that we won't simply take your word for what you think you heard. The verifiability rule frustrates us all at times. But we have to live with it if the content is to have any integrity at all. --Drmargi (talk) 20:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjs4fRCnb3g You do not have to post what I say but you should not treat people with disrespect. "you think you heard" Are you trying to tell me I am crazy? I find this very offense!

Since that video has nothing to do with anything, shall I assume you have no reliable source and this discussion is over? -- Fyrefly (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)