User talk:Trunks ishida

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Trunks ishida, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shuipzv3 (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined BLP PROD

Hi. I've declined your BLP PROD on Anna S. Fisher, because it only applies to living people and the subject of this article is dead. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Trunks + Boing - Re:Anna S. Fisher Thank you for your attention. BLP PROD? I have listed references as requested. I am puzzled somewhat by this process. I am unsure why this article wouldn't be listed as a stub and then whoever was interested in moving forward could amend the article? It seemed like the WikiPolice are fast on deletion rather than inclusive progress? Are the references ok as re-edited? WilliamJustinM —Preceding undated comment added 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I am not sure what are you puzzled about. But yeah, it was my mistake for using BLP PROD instead of 'PROD' or tagging as 'Unreferenced'. What you say is correct - it could be listed as a stub and later expanded - but obviously we need some reference to verify that the article is about a real person or a complete fabrication!

If at this point someone created an article about me being dead and without any reference, it may have been listed as a stub even-though I'm still alive!

I hope you understand my point.

trunks_ishida (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CSD

Hi. I've declined your speedy deletion request on Adyghe State University. Deletion reason A1 is for "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article", but the article, even though it is only a one-sentence stub, does clearly identify what the subject is -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the trouble. I think I have to learn more about the reasons and assertions for deletion. trunks_ishida (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - the CSD categories can be tricky. If you ever need any help with anything, you're always welcome over on my Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely Boing. Trunks, this ([1]) is not considered acceptable. Please view the policy guidelines before contacting a page creator. Thank you. Abhijay ^Talk?/_Deeds 07:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again. I'm new here so it'll take some time to know all the rules here. I should have tagged it as 'stub' rather than 'Article lacking sufficient context' . trunks_ishida (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all Trunks. No Problem. Just contact me or any admin if you'd like some help. Abhijay ^Talk?/_Deeds 02:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your tag was late by one minute

Am adding sections etc to Match-fixing in professional sumo and in fact beat your tag by one minute. : ) FourTildes (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, . You must have added section while I was editing other pages..... You beat me indeed ! :)

Now, I'll refresh pages before editing/tagging them. Thanks for notifying that!

PS: I tried deleting the tags but you beat me at that too! :) trunks_ishida (talk) 00:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I knew you meant well. Actually, I should have had the article more ready before I finished my edit. I will be more careful in the future. ;) FourTildes (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand A. Hermens

Thanks for your help in adding the templates. As I am too new to Wikipedia I was not familiar with such means. In my first approach to this article about the advisor of my doctoral thesis I just wanted to get started and I added as many links (following the "no orphans" policy) as possible. I am aware of many shortcomings and I will try to deal with them soon. Khnassmacher (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It takes time to get used to Wikipedia.

Keep up the progress and if you need any help, feel free to ask! :)

trunks_ishida (talk) 00:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, because you improved my article last year and I have improved it since then, this is my next call for your kind help: I have entered references and categories. However, this was obviously not done in the proper way. Can you please add the necessary technical improvements? Thanks a lot, Khnassmacher (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the categories and references. I hope it was according to what you wanted. I don't find any more problems with references. If you want, you can use citation template also but it is not necessary. Thanks for giving an opportunity to help (feel free to ask for more)! Also Please notify me if I messed up something! :D

trunks_ishida (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! It feels so great to find a helping hand when you need it. Now I will try to fix the LoC reference and work on further details of his life and work to meet the notability criteria. All the best for 2012, Khnassmacher (talk) 06:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Greetings for The New Year and Happy Editing ! :)

trunks_ishida (talk) 13:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy criterion A2

I've declined your A2 speedy tag at Viliam Loviska, because A2 is for pages that are identical to works in foreign languages at those languages' Wikipedias; English-language articles don't qualify. Nyttend (talk) 15:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A2 was a bit confusing but I understand now. Thanks for notifying that and Sorry for the trouble !

trunks_ishida (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! It wasn't any trouble, so you needn't have apologised :-) Nyttend (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Sense of Honor

It is a stub. It does not have a lead.

As far as merging, that is not a crazy idea. But I would prefer to see if this grows. Or if I get the urge to grow it.

Reverted your tags. Please do not tag so aggressively. Discuss on article talk or user talk (as here) instead. Tags discourage contributions. And deface articles. Is a form of what Sue calls "the website yelling at users". The readers know our content is user contributed and incomplete. The tag is not helpful to them and defaces the article. Sometimes for years, sans any action. In particular for a stub iconed article, it is already "covered" that the thing may have multiple issues...by that stub icon.

Write and contribute content yourself. It will develop you, the 'pedia, and lead to much better interactions than tagging.

TCO (talk) 14:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I appreciate the fact that you want the article to expand, but the fact remains that the information provided on A Sense of Honor is almost the same as what is already on Jim Webb's works section. That's why I suggested to merge them.

Aggressively? Not really!

But I disagree with you on the tags issue.

Tags never deface an Article and they encourage contribution. Readers do know that the content is user contributed and incomplete, but tags point them in the correct direction. If readers notices a cleanup/copy-edit tag on an article , the chances of their contribution would be higher. Also, was it really tagged as stub?

I'm contributing to Wikipedia in my own way and I feel that tags are just suggestions and not a negative remark.

PS: I will admit that it was obviously my mistake to tag it as {{lead too long}}, but believe me, it happened twice today. Instead of tagging an article as {{Lead too short}} they were tagged as {{lead too long}}. Maybe it was a problem with TWINKLE or maybe it was my fault.... Sorry for that.

trunks_ishida (talk) 18:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced Tag to Tyrone Trice

Hi there. I noticed you put an unreferenced tag to the Tyrone Trice article shortly after I created it. I have added several referenced and just have to add the reference information and formating. I should be able to do so in the coming days. I removed your tag due to me adding the references, so if you want to have another look at it and let me know if more referenced are required then by all means. Cheers --Auger Martel (talk) 11:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I usually patrol the articles that were created about an hour ago to avoid tagging recently created articles. I may have drifted to your article accidentally and I must have tagged it mistaking it for being created an hour ago. I'm sorry for that and thanks for notifying !

About the Article-

I noticed you added many references to it. But one reference, the first one http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=000937&cat=boxer displays a forbidden error. Kindly look into it. Thanks and Cheers ! :)

trunks_ishida (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it on the article. For your assistance:

Cheers

--Auger Martel (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually come to think of it, the second link I just posted is the same I originally posted. They both work fine for me. Maybe the site was down for maintenance? Let me know either way. Cheers. --Auger Martel (talk) 12:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. It is still not working for me. Upon loading returns this→

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /media/index.php on this server.

Works fine on my mobile device but doesn't work on my Windows and Linux system. Not even the homepage (boxrec.com) is accessible. Don't know why !

trunks_ishida (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thanks

Thanks for catching this. - Amaury (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad to Help ! :) trunks_ishida (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STiki emergency

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunil Grover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sirsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sunil Grover may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Vidya Mandir, Dabwali and B.Com. from Guru Nanak College. He has done his masters in Theatre from [[Chandigarh]. He is well known for playing the role of Fakira in recent Bollywood movie ''[[Zila]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bishun Khare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bishun Khare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishun Khare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Educationtemple (talk) 08:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trunks ishida. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trunks ishida. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trunks ishida. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]