User talk:Trulyy

Modifying a closed discussion to directly accuse another editor of bad faith

This is to let you know that I have referred this to the administrative notice board Rob Roilen (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I shall do the same for you and your clear disregard for wikipedia's longstanding editing guidelines in favor of your personal opinions. Trulyy (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oi!

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Viva la Vendetta)} 14:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The diffs linked at the AN/I thread by CoffeeCrumbs ([1] and [2]) are obvious severe violations WP:BLP violations which you added and then never came back to reference -- and even reverted someone correctly removing one. Both are tagged as minor edits. In July you put a deliberate hoax in an article. Here you made an article contain an allegation of sexual assault which contradicted the cited source, described this edit as "fixed grammar", and marked it as minor.

I don't think it is possible to stress this enough: editing articles about living people to make unsourced negative claims about them in a way designed to evade detection is not permitted. It is extremely damaging and hurtful to the people it's done to, and furthermore damages the reputation of the site and puts it in legal danger. You have done this repeatedly, over the course of months, in a way that suggests that you're aware it is against the rules but simply do not care, or want to fly under the radar. If I see you do this again I will immediately indefinitely block you. jp×g 🗯️ 18:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please link to me where I made defamatory statements. I am unaware I did such a thing. Trulyy (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am aware in the past when I was new to editing I incorrectly labeled articles as minor or used an improper edit summary which has been clarified on the notice board. The allegation against deshaun Watson was credible and widely reported. Trulyy (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I cannot see the 'deliberate hoax', as the hyperlink only links to my talk page. Trulyy (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not tried to evade detection, and while I previously, during those edits, was unaware of the extent of sourcing for BLP, all edits I made were true, as can be confirmed, even if I didn't source them. Since then, I have sourced my edits, but please note that while I did make a mistake, no edits I made were defamatory or improper. Trulyy (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the several messages, as I am on mobile and am forgetting to mention certain things. I would just like to reiterate that I cannot see the edits you have referenced, as all the links are to the current versions of the pages and not my edits of them. Trulyy (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As has been cleared up by experienced editors, they have observed my edit history and come to the conclusion I have made no bad faith edits, rather was slow to learn the full extent of Wikipedia guidelines when editing at the begenning. No other editor other than CookieCrumbs or Rob Roilen (the latter of which having been indeffed for his arguments against me), and the former of which having had my edits justified by an admin, have accused me of making bad faith or defamatory edits.

Again, observing the edits I've made, while unsourced, which was an honest mistake, none of them were false or defamatory. Trulyy (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, sorry for the drawn out messages as it is harder to formulate arguments on mobile, but I'd like to point out what CoffeeCrumbs said later in the thread in response to me:

I didn't mean to convey the idea that I thought that was your fault; it was simply meant as a general observation. If you will just leave hatted conversations be and be careful with that minor edit checkbox, that's certainly enough for me.

To explain my thinking during those edits, which, are written with NPOV, my understanding was that edits that are short and concise, such as those edits being 1-2 sentences, were considered minor. Trulyy (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit reverting someone correctly removing one, I believe was proper. As npr stated:

Lowry added, “They’ve only found two Springfield residents calling to complain about Haitian [word] — migrants taking geese from ponds.”

Trulyy (talk) 18:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My last request before your response is that you link directly to the edits I made that you are most concerned about and explain why to give me the opportunity to back those edits up and provide sources. Trulyy (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]