Jump to content

User talk:True Genius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is genius? What good is genius-level IQ if you never apply it?

[edit]

Does IQ really measure intelligence?

[edit]

Richard Feynman claimed to have an IQ of no higher than 120, yet he is reknowned as a great genius.

What is intelligence?

[edit]

I intelligence a skill set, a trait, or a program? Or is it all of these things? Is it more?

Smarts

[edit]

The ignorant person is said to be not so smart, while the well educated person is very smart.

Is knowledge a structural component of intelligence?

Speed as a factor

[edit]

Assuming that you get every question you answer right, if you can't complete the IQ test in the alotted time, then you will not receive as high a score as someone with the same error ratio who completed the test. Your IQ as measured by the test is less.

If you think twice as fast, are you twice as intelligent?

Are instructions intelligent?

[edit]

And are you more intelligent when you gain access to better instructions?

If you have access to instructions on how to do something twice as accurately as with the instructions your competitor has, and you do a better job because of this, are you smarter than him?

Are there intelligent machines?

[edit]

Are computers intelligent? Are programs intelligent?

re: the way to move pages

[edit]

uh, what are you talking about? sorry. --gatoatigrado 02:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that. --gatoatigrado 15:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

[edit]

When moving pages, please check for double-redirects, per the instructions given. See [1], [2], etc. (I don't have time to fix, so I'll leave for you ;) Thanks. --Quiddity·(talk) 02:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know what I'm doing. Thanks though, you never know. --True Genius 03:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please replace User talk:True Genius/Lists of basic topics. Thanks. --Quiddity·(talk) 19:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

opinion

[edit]

As an editor of Lists of topics, I'd like your opinion at Topics redesign. Thanks. --gatoatigrado 15:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Account discontinued

[edit]

See  The Transhumanist   23:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Energy consumption

[edit]


- This image is really cool, I think having an image showing increase and decreasing power consumption based on amount is cool. That being said, it's really hard to understand. The color key is not very big, not well explained, and even after looking at it for 5 mins I'm still not sure I understand it correctly. I think it needs to be redone so that it's easier to understand.--Sparkygravity (talk) 13:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basic topics listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Basic topics. Since you had some involvement with the Basic topics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of basic classical topics listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of basic classical topics. Since you had some involvement with the List of basic classical topics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]