User talk:True.philomath

Welcome!

Hello, True.philomath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 05:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

True.philomath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

193.188.105.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Leakingisgood". The reason given for Leakingisgood's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: Favonian (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Looks like collateral damage, I've cleared the autoblock, you should be able to edit now. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot.

Speedy deletion nomination of Healthcare Digital Systems

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Healthcare Digital Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Marriage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Marriage

Why did you change the content on Talk:Marriage and replace part of it with a discussion to it that took place in 2011? I'm seeing this as disruptive editing; an ANI discussion has been started about you regarding these edits, and I highly recommend that you respond there and explain... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I am not a frequent wikipedia editor. I just wanted to remove a comment I had written previously. I did not realize this would be problematic. The comment I had written was poorly worded and can be misunderstood to mean something I did not intent and do not agree with. That is all.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Androuwaheeb (talk • contribs) 05:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]