User talk:Troyeebarua

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Italy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bonadea (talk) 14:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

This is your last warning(Not my last warning! HAHA!). You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Kiki kannibal. Ckatz^chat _spy 07:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Piano. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cosmic Latte (talk) 13:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Tmth, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cosmic Latte (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Pranab dutta"

A page you created, Pranab dutta, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 08:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right to be wrong

A tag has been placed on Right to be wrong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WWGB (talk) 08:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Asdda

A tag has been placed on Asdda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cosmic Latte (talk) 13:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lulziness

A tag has been placed on Lulziness, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cosmic Latte (talk) 13:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Great latitude

An article that you have been involved in editing, Great latitude, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great latitude. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cosmic Latte (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of kewlios

A tag has been placed on List of kewlios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Troyee Barua

A tag has been placed on Troyee Barua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Frehley^Space ^Ace 12:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Jac16888 ^Talk 12:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello admin, please also consider this edit. Drmies (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]