User talk:Troycaliroy

What other Wikipedia accounts have you used?Breaking sticks (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just this one and some from an IP address last week before creating an account User:Troycaliroy (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Troycaliroy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my only account that I've used. I made edits from this same computer within the past two-three weeks before signing-up for an account as I enjoyed helping to contribute. You can verify via IPs that there is only one account that I have.

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Troycaliroy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please let me know what evidence or data you need to prove that this is my only account. Verifying my IP address should be more than sufficient. I will happily comply with and provide any data you need. If you need government ID, address or any other sort of verifiable info to let you know this is one single account, please let me know!

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the behavioral commonalities with Naadobea1776, namely editing of Ryan Vet. Please also explain any conflict of interest you have regarding this subject. MER-C 18:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Troycaliroy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know who you are even referencing with Naadobea1776. An in terms of the page Ryan Vet I am a publicist with the firm that works with his company and we were working on cleaning up profiles of their executives.

Decline reason:

In your unblock reason you appear to admit violation of Wikipedia's WP:PAID disclosure policy ("I am a publicist with the firm that works with his company and we were working on cleaning up profiles of their executives.") without indicating your future willingness to comply with it. Continued blocking, therefore, is necessary to "prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia" as per WP:BLOCKP and your request for unblocking, on that basis, is declined.
You are welcome to continue participation in the Wikipedia project as a non-editing reader. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia! Chetsford (talk) 07:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.