User talk:Trixleworks

Vocativ

Thank you very much for your contributions to Wikipedia! It seems you are in the midst of an edit war with a fellow Wikipedian, in which both parties are attempting to shape the Vocativ page in a manner that is not consistent with Wikipedia. The manner in which we prefer to proceed with these kinds of issues here at Wikipedia, is to engage the other party on the article's talk page, and not simply to revert their contributions without comment. In lieu of admonishing you both, I will be going through the page and ensuring that all the content is properly sourced and written in neutral language, following which, please feel free to engage with your fellow editors on the talk page to discuss a constructive manner in carrying forward with the page. Again, thank you for your contributions, happy to have you here! Usterday (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. I have reviewed your edit history and two things come to mind. The first is that there are several accounts that appear to be pursuing the same disruptive pattern as you, reverting to a poorly sourced attack page that is not within the rules of Wikipedia. Sockpuppetry is against the rules of Wikipedia. The second is that you are making reverts without proper discussion on the talk page. Please discuss your issues on the talk page, as further edit-warring is not acceptable. Usterday (talk) 13:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue your POV editing. The material that you are continually putting back into the article violates numerous Wikipedia policies. You gave been warned many times to cease this behavior. Wikipedia is not a forum for vendetta.Intermittentgardener (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vocativ

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Largeinthehipsroomy, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Usterday (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fatuouslemon (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 18:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]