User talk:Tristan Navera
Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
| |||||||
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions. | |||||||
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Tristan Navera. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
LeVeque Tower
[edit]Why did you take out the new photo of details? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- Will put it back in when I've finished with the prose there; the image keeps moving the quote and the shot of the spire down in an awkward way. Tristan (talk) 04:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LeVeque Tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lobby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of LeVeque Tower
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LeVeque Tower you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello - I'll aim to complete my part this weekend. If you've any queries, just drop me a line on the review Talk page. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of LeVeque Tower
[edit]The article LeVeque Tower you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:LeVeque Tower for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 14:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi - Wrapped that up quicker than I thought. A mix of comments/suggestions/amendments. By no means all to be taken on board if you don't agree - just give them consideration. Drop me a line on the Talkpage if there's anything you want to discuss. The normal on-hold period is 7 days. Does that work for you? All the best. KJP1 (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know! I'm going to get to work on these in the next few days. Tristan (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- No problem and good to hear from you. Just let me know if you need longer than the standard seven days. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know! I'm going to get to work on these in the next few days. Tristan (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of LeVeque Tower
[edit]The article LeVeque Tower you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:LeVeque Tower for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 10:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Congratulations
[edit]From a fellow citizen of Columbus congratulations on getting LeVeque Tower to Good Article status! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! Tristan (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Columbus Buggy Company
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Columbus Buggy Company you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Chrysalia -- Nova Chrysalia (talk) 02:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Columbus Buggy Company
[edit]The article Columbus Buggy Company you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Columbus Buggy Company for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Chrysalia -- Nova Chrysalia (talk) 03:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Columbus Buggy Company
[edit]The article Columbus Buggy Company you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Columbus Buggy Company for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Chrysalia -- Nova Chrysalia (talk) 02:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment for Newspapers project?
[edit]Hi, I'm working on an article about the Newspapaers on Wikipedia project. Might you take a few minutes (ideally in the next 48 hours) to fill in a few answers on this form? It would be a big help! Thanks, -Pete Forsyth (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tristan Navera. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Graeter's you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 11:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- I apologize for the delay in finishing my review. I have left some preliminary notes at Talk:Graeter's/GA1, feel free to respond to them whenever you can. Mz7 (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
The article Graeter's you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Graeter's for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 10:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, it has been some time since we last spoke on this. Do you think you could revisit the article sometime this week? Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ah! Yes, thank you. I will take care of this. Tristan (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Graeter's you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Graeter's for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 02:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |