User talk:Tristan He

A page you started (Potamogeton acutifolius) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Potamogeton acutifolius, Tristan He!

Wikipedia editor Spirit of Eagle just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job on your article on Potamogeton acutifolius. I tagged it for not having a lead section, but that can be easily fixed with a sentence or two.

To reply, leave a comment on Spirit of Eagle's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Placement of refs in the English Wikipedia

Hi, I understand the logic of your placement of references at Potamogeton acutifolius, but see MOS:REFPUNC – the English Wikipedia places refs after full stops and commas. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Groan! I've just been editing these so that they go before full stops and commas. I wasn't aware of the Wikipedia style which, frankly, defies all normal English punctuation rules. But hey ho, life is too short and I'm more focussed at the moment on slowly working my way through British aquatic plants (especially Potamogeton, which are currently pretty minimalist to say the least.

Good to see others are reading (and hopefully using) these pages though. Suggestions on additional content welcome. Regards, Tristan 17:47 20 November 2014 (GMT)

I quite understand the groan! The English Wikipedia has a range of what seem to me quite idiosyncratic style "rules". (Another one is that sentence case should be used in section/subsection headings, so "Ecology and Conservation" should be "Ecology and conservation".)

One other point: MOS:IMAGES says "avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other, or between an image and infobox, navigation template, or similar." If you view Wikipedia on a small screen (e.g. a tablet) it can look very bad when there's an image + text + another image side by side. So I moved the images to the right. Left-placed images only really work in long articles.

It's always good to see more plant articles, especially ones as well-written and as carefully referenced as Potamogeton acutifolius. Are you aware of the resources at WP:PLANTS, including the template at WP:PLANTS/Template? (The text of the template has grown far too much, in my view, but the section headings are useful.) For perfection at Potamogeton acutifolius there could be a short "Taxonomy" section. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Peter, will fix images. Would the sort of additional information in the taxon box under P. compressus be suitable? Also will take a look at the template.

For an example of a very brief Taxonomy section see, e.g., Roscoea ganeshensis § Taxonomy. One reason why this is considered worthwhile is that there are categories of the form "Plants described in YEAR" (it really means "plant species described in YEAR") which can be added to species articles. Providing a reference for who named the species and when it was named supports this categorization. The Taxonomy section is also often a good place to explain the origin of the specific epithet. I don't think it's usually sensible to have long lists of synonyms in the Taxonomy section unless they need discussing. The taxobox is usually better. (An example of where I thought a discussion was useful is Lophospermum scandens § Taxonomy.) Peter coxhead (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's a coincidence - Bill Baker was at university with me - I remember him raising money to go out on that expedition - looking for Pleione forrestii as I remember? Should be no problem adding this section, and also would be a good place to discuss / link to related taxa. The template you mentioned is comprehensive but quite daunting isn't it? Perhaps also more relevant to terrestrial species in places, and I personally would put habitat information under Ecology, not Distribution.

I would not describe myself as a taxonomist, but I am familiar with the basic naming conventions.

The small world phenomenon strikes again, I guess!

Yes, the plants template is daunting. It used to be quite reasonable, but over the last couple of years or so people have kept adding to it, which I think is a mistake. Perhaps there needs to be another page with an "outline template". There's certainly no need to keep to the template too rigidly; if habitat goes better under ecology (which I think it may often do), then put it there. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Potamogeton pages

For information, I have been substantially editing the following pages on pondweeds (Potamogeton): Potamogeton (genus) - needs a major edit. Potamogeton alpinus - largely complete. Potamogeton acutifolius - largely complete Potamogeton praelongus - minor updates needed Potamogeton lucens - updates needed Potamogeton perfoliatus - updates needed Potamogeton gramineus - largely complete Potamogeton compressus - updates needed Potamogeton polygonifolius - updates needed Potamogeton berchtoldii - updates needed Potamogeton crispus - updates needed Potamogeton x griffithii - updates needed

Comments on any of the above welcome. Tristan Tristan He (talk) 15:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potamogeton × angustifolius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petiolate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potamogeton friesii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mesotrophic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tristan He. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tristan He. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tristan He. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]