User talk:Tribal007

February 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Master (2021 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Love Jihad have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Love Jihad was changed by Tribal007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892023 on 2021-02-08T01:43:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Tribal007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy was changed by Tribal007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885958 on 2021-05-10T04:45:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ab207 (talk) 05:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm KyloRen3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ayurveda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyloRen3 (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rice Christian. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. This edit is not supported by any of the cited sources. In fact, you removed one source. Please be mindful. Thank you. KyloRen3 (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can add semi protection to the article rice Christian Tribal007 (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I don't see a lot of vandalism. KyloRen3 (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the creation of this article Many people are adding there own original research stuffs. Tribal007 (talk) 03:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to Social Democratic Party of India, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SunDawn talk 16:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hi Tribal007! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Nordic model that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Removing sourced content is not a minor edit. TylerBurden (talk) 06:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just did this again, on top of justifying your removal of not only what is specifically discussed in the content, but also in the source with your original research claim of "Socialists around the world have the misconception that nordic countries are socialist. It is not an American only misconception". The article does not say it is an "American only" misconception, but it raises an American example which is a good one since if high level politicians like Bernie Sanders have it, less politically inclined Americans are likely to have it too. Hence why the Danish prime minister delivered the speech. If you plan on continuing making these edits, then you should gain consensus in the article talk page before this becomes an edit war. TylerBurden (talk) 12:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Nordic model, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned about this before, you are not only adding original research, but you are misrepresenting someones quote. Keep this up and you will be reported. TylerBurden (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Tribal007! Your additions to Freedom of religion in India have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]