User talk:Trevor GH5

Go ahead and comment.

RE: Your copyright paranoia

Is getting ridiculous, seriously can somebody ban this guy? I'm referring to your comments on Ashley Massaro's Playboy cover. Trevor GH5 01:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don't waste your time trying to explain your reasoning to me I've read all the relevant discussions and you have a deluded, sad agenda against any and all pics. Trevor GH5 01:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not against these ones. --Abu badali ^(talk) 07:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:NFL Draft

You're welcome. The trades are not as important as the picks, obviously, but it's always good to include all of the information that we can. I think the recent years' articles, like 2007 NFL Draft, are pretty good models. ×Meegs 19:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Pro Bowl Players

Pro Bowl colors are for players that made it to pro-bowl at any time in their career. Gman124 03:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving Abu badali has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali. You have expressed an interest in this before, so please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Workshop.

Thanks, - Jord 16:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Generic Userbox

I posted a response to your generic userbox question on the userbox talk page. Click here to see it.
--FastLizard4 (Talk|Contribs) 02:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Evans (footballer born 1962) comments

Can you plese see my comments on the Steve Evans (footballer born 1962) talk page and give me your views on them. Kingjamie 10:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the two sections requested. Kingjamie 20:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grumble grumble (beat me!)

Good thing that you created this. I was discussing this with a related user, about sections in the Maglev train article (but this has been mainly cleared up anyway). I am referring to Template:Toomanysections. Simply south 11:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pandora Dreams

A tag has been placed on Pandora Dreams, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ali ^(t)_(c) 21:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I've deleted the page as it lacked context. You may recreate it later, as long as it provides context, asserts notability and meets WP:PORNBIO. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walking plank

Hi it is definitely not a myth as there is reference to it in The Times during the 1820s/30s. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 16:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed it again as placing that statement in such a prominent position would make people think it was a myth and a 20th century creation. It clearly was not a myth or a 20th century creation if the phrase was printed in the Times in the 1820s. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 12:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not believe that the phrase "walk the plank" is used in The Times in 1829? If you do believe that please explain to me why we should give credance to theories that it is a creation of 20th Century cinema? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 10:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Watts (football player)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ted Watts (football player), by Louis Alberto Guel (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ted Watts (football player) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Duplicate of Ted Watts.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ted Watts (football player), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (pornographic actors)

There is a discussion occuring here regarding nominations for an award counting as a sign of notability. As an active participant in WP:P*, your input is welcomed. Tabercil 15:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York Giants

I can vouch for everything about that colloquialism "Jints" except for the statement that it is now used in reference to the football Giants. There, we're taking someone's word for it. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read your note. I'm not sure what you're getting at about "attitude". You made a comment about not taking peoples' word for it, which is a totally fair statement, and all I'm telling you in the above is that while the reference to "Jints" relating to the baseball Giants is something I can verify, I don't have any information about the uncited part you had left in originally, about the football team being called the "Jints". For that, I'm taking the word of whoever put that info there. Perhaps it should be cited also? In any case, I'll just assume I don't get your sense of humor, as apparently you don't get mine. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 08:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it would appear that it's you that has the snippy attitude. And I'm still waiting for someone to cite some evidence confirming the actual usage of the nickname "Jints", as well as its "current" pronunciation, for the NFL's Giants. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 01:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toomanysections

Hey, just a bit of standard author notification for you: I have nominated {{Toomanysections}} (which you created) for deletion here alongside an analogous template that (interestingly) was created 2 days before yours. If you have any comments about the matter, your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Gracenotes^T § 20:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clackson scroll formula

Dear Trevor, I just noticed your question on the discussion page for this article.

Well, in the formula

$l=\pi \cdot s\cdot n^{2}$

$\pi$ is 22/7, s is the spacing between the turns of your scroll and n is the number of complete turns in your scroll (which in the formula is "squared", i.e. multiplied by itself, which is what the little 2 means). You multiply all these together, i.e.

l = 22/7 x s x n x n

would be another way of writing it.

I find this formula a very useful way of estimating pretty accurately the amount of stock I will need for a job.

As for the second formula in the article, someone else added that. It seems to be about how the scroll formula was worked out, but I am not mathematician.

Foundryman 21:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you take a look?

An image used in the article on the first Bangladeshi pornstar Jazmin, Image:WorshipThisBitch3.jpg, the cover of the DVD that made her the selling point, a first for a Bangladeshi, is up for deletion here. You may be interested to take a look. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 21:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

L.T.'s sack totals

Having looked at the wiki standard, the standard for wikipedia is verifiability. The New York Giants are the source for the 142 sacks. As long as the 9.5 sacks his rookie season are noted as unofficial then the 142 is the accurate and verifiable number. I do not understand why the NFL policy would be the "controlling legal" authority. According to wikipedai, verifiability is. The 142 sacks are verifiable in scores of places. In fact, the NFL may be one of the few people who use the false figure of 133.5. So, before there is an edit war, let's go to the discussion page and have people discuss.

Further, there is plenty of misinofrmation about the MVPs as well. I am fully aware that there are publications that list Gino Marchetti as the 1958 AP NFL MVP, they are not accurate. Futher, Joe Schmidt was not an AP MVP in 1960. Alan page was the first defensive player to win the AP NFL MVP. Lawrence Taylor was the second.72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Alba

I see your negative edit about Jessica Alba. I will be starting a discussion shortly over editorial decisions to include negative information.

In any biography, there is probably a tendency for fans to be attracted to an article. Therefore, consensus could be wrong. For example, the Jessica Alba or Governor Bill Richardson article is probably watched by people who like these two individuals. Add negative information and it is possible that it will be deleted citing "consensus".

I am not that kind of person. I seek the correct editing position. Include negative and positive information. However, I also see the posibility of article manipulation by gangs of fans. Therefore, I seek a broader consensus on the policy.

I am alerting you because I follow the highest ethical standards and transparency policy even though I like Jessica Alba and wouldn't mind a very positive article written for a fan, like me. Spevw (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) FYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28policy%29#Editing_the_correct_unbiased_version_instead_of_being_manipulated_by_gangs.3F Spevw (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PORNBIO

As a member of WikiProject Pornography, I'm just letting you know there's currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography about changing the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Your opinions would be appreciated. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 15:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I saw you kept some tabs on the spam on y talk page. Ty. Quadzilla99 (talk) 09:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. I have changed the name of the section you mentioned.

It is difficult finding sources for articles on little known species so I have to use what I can find. The University of Florida had 2 web pages about Lyctus planicollis. I have now changed all my references to the Featured Creatures page which has the primary sources at the bottom of the page whereas this does not.

I did wonder about the photos. These have a rather ugly black number section at the bottom right corner. It would look better to remove these digitally but I expect that would not be a proper thing to do. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curtis Green

The article Curtis Green has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rick Donnalley

The article Rick Donnalley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 0qd (talk) 04:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Woerner

The article Scott Woerner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elizabeth Olivet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth Olivet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]