User talk:Trevor800

WrestleMania

Please note WrestleMania 34 exists, however there is probably not sufficient evidence right now to support a stand alone article. If you feel there is, you can attempt to change the redirect to an article, but I would not be surprised if that change was reverted at this point. If you have information you would like to create I suggest utilizing your sandbox for now to develop before going live. - Galatz ^Talk 17:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks Trevor800 (talk) 17:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Grand Theft Auto V are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Rumble (2018), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 05:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Undertaker. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 22:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bill Goldberg, you may be blocked from editing. Bill Goldberg will not become an inductee into WWE's Hall of Fame until the Hall of Fame ceremony in April. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Bill Goldberg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nikki♥311 23:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bill Goldberg. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Bill Goldberg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry I Promise I Wont Do Edit Wars Again Please Unblock me Im Sorry Trevor800 (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Trevor800 reported by User:Jd22292 (Result: ). Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To:Edgar181

Please unblock me i am sorry for sock puppetry. Trevor800 (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a guide and a template above you are supposed to use to request unblock. - Galatz ^Talk 02:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To:Jd22292

Can you show me how to unblock my account please i am very sorry for edit wars and sock puppetry. Trevor800 (talk) 03:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) It has been described above, but I will explain again: you need to use {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, replacing "Your reason here" with a valid reason why you should be unblocked. See also WP:UNBLOCK. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your original account? Were you editing while logged out? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To:Edgar181

Thank You,You can now email me whenever you like bud. Trevor800 (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevor800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Promise not to edit war and not cause vandalism and sock puppetryTrevor800 (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your original account? Were you editing while logged out? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevor800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock PuppetryTrevor800 (talk) 03:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Autounblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevor800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock PuppetryTrevor800 (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevor800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock PuppetryTrevor800 (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)or: Edit Waring[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help Unblocking Trevor800 (talk) 04:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note for reviewing admin: There's a lot of different sockfarms and trolling going on around Bill Goldberg (some using similar edit summaries as this editor). Having watched the above, I can't decide if this is more of the same or something else. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN:

Confirmed to Hdidgjhdhfjgj (talk · contribs), but that account hasn't made any edits. T800 is probably trying to edit while logged out and encountering the autoblock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To:Edgar181

Can you unblock for me because i cant do it Trevor800 (talk) 04:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevor800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock Puppetry and VandalismTrevor800 (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To:Edgar181

How long am i blocked and when will i be unblocked ? Trevor800 (talk) 04:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

{{unblock}} Trevor800 (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are still not following the guidelines given above. You need to convince an admin why to unblock you not just say what you did. If you keep putting up these useless unblock templates I wouldn't be surprised if an admin adds your own talk page to pages you are blocked from using, and then you wont be able to ever request an unblock again. - Galatz ^Talk 12:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have in fact just done exactly that, and have disabled the appeal above (since no-one is going to unblock based on it). Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]