User talk:Trevanbaxter

Welcome!

Hello, Trevanbaxter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lieutenant Colonel Simon Fordham, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ian Rose (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lieutenant Colonel Simon Fordham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lieutenant Colonel Simon Fordham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ian Rose (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevanbaxter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my network was blocked, however I am a legitimate contributor and if you look at my edits I have done nothing to warrant a block. I am incredibly confused and would love an explanation at why I have been barred from editing if one of edits was the grounds for a block. I look forward to hearing from you and contributing to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This account is not blocked; if you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so, so we can find out what's stopping you editing! Yamla (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Trevanbaxter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

72.24.13.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

I was blocked as a group of IP addresses, I am unsure why I was blocked my guess is I am using a public network and someone may have done something, as far as I am concerned none of my edits have been incorrect or improperly sourced. I look forward to figuring this out and would love to hear back.

Blocking administrator: Berean Hunter (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: I've dealt with the block not meaning to affect you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trevanbaxter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked as a group of IP addresses, I am unsure why I was blocked my guess is I am using a public network and someone may have done something, as far as I am concerned none of my edits have been incorrect or improperly sourced. I look forward to figuring this out and would love to hear back. Also I am confused at the process to reverse this block.

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request is needed. Closing this one, but leaving the request above open. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of José Martínez (football manager)

The article José Martínez (football manager) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a football manager who does not WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Martínez (football manager) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Martínez (football manager) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Martínez (football manager) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Staff in the Allsvenskan

Hi there - what is the intended purpose/extent of this category? Giant Snowman 07:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Giant It is to put all the backroom and technical staff pages for the Allsvenskan in one place.[reply]

That is not notable. It has been moved to cover all managers only. Giant Snowman 07:38, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Trevanbaxter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24619 was submitted on Apr 05, 2019 16:43:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:43, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating One Stone (nonprofit).

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the One Stone organization.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brigham Young University–Idaho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalmar FF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anders Henriksson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anders Henriksson (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anders Henriksson (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Henriksson (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Basar Čarovac

The article Basar Čarovac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no RS on this person; climbing the 7 summits is not notable in climbing (i.e. just climbing Everest is not longer notable on its own); can't find anything on him in the climbing media, which is the source of his proposed notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]