User talk:Trentond2003

Trentond2003, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Trentond2003! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey

What was that for? Reverted. Bishonen | talk 20:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen That user deleted my user page for some odd reason. Probably vandalizing.

No, they weren't vandalizing. Wikipedia is not a webhost, and your userpage, like the rest of the encyclopedia, isn't supposed to be used for self-promotion unrelated to encyclopedia-writing. Please see Wikipedia:User pages for the purpose of userpages. In any case, you don't get to harass editors for simply following Wikipedia rules. I have deleted the page you created, Danielland; again, Wikipedia isn't for self-promotion or for something made up one day, including one-person "micronations". Bishonen | talk 21:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Republic of Molossia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trentond2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done any "vandalizing." I changed some FALSE info on the Molossia Page. Ublock my page PLEASE, If not I can just create another one on a different IP Address.

Decline reason:

I find that hard to believe, especially given edits you made today such as this. And this. Also, threatening to create a sock puppet account to evade your block is not going to get you unblocked. Unblock request denied. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | talk 21:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trentond2003, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Chris Troutman (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]