Jump to content

User talk:WikiFazBear1984

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Trent931)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, WikiFazBear1984! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 23:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Trenton 1214 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trenton 1214. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 12:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WHAT???????? WikiFazBear1984 (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiFazBear1984 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hello, I am requesting an unblock. I understand if it is not allowed, though. I'll start from the very beginning. When I was younger, I made an account Trenton 1214. I was immature, and I vandalized a few pages. I made another account for basically the same thing that same day I got blocked. Then, about a year later, I decided to take Wikipedia seriously. I tried my hardest to contribute to Wikipedia and improve articles. Mainly with this account, I'm appealing. It got blocked because of sock puppeting even though I didn't vandalize. I then made a few other accounts so I could continue contributing to wikipedia. If you look at their editing history, there is nothing bad that I did to destroy a page. I just want to contribute to Wikipedia. My vandalism days are over. With this account, I have edited and contributed a lot. If you guys think I have vandalized on this account, it was probably a misunderstanding, and I could explain the reason. I totally understand if you don't trust me. But I just really like editing Wikipedia, and now I'm doing it for good. I'm sorry for my old vandalism. It has been almost 3 years since I vandalized the page on purpose. I am very sad that my edits were all reverted. I am sorry for everything. WikiFazBear1984 (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You should make this request from your original account. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As 331dot says, you should have appealed from your original account, rather than creating this account to evade your block. Then, when this account got blocked, you should have appealed at the time, not created two further accounts (ShaquilleOatmeal7 and Spycrab Enthusiast) to evade this block. It's a bit late to be asking for an unblock now; see WP:SO. Girth Summit (blether) 13:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]