User talk:TreasuryTag/Archives/2008/Oct

Image:Saxon-ribbon.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saxon-ribbon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 12:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:MI5.jpg

I'm have no experience in these matters, so forgive me if this is a stupid question. Since you marked the Image:MI5.jpg with {{di-no source|date=9 October 2008}}, Andy Dingley has added a source for that image. May that tag now be removed? Should Andy Dingley have removed it? May anybody remove it it?

Also (to help me understand how these things work): given that the image comes from Commons and no action to delete it seems to occur there, would deleting it on EN Wikipedia have any effect? -- Regards, Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Good ¦ questions, neither of which I know the answer to, I didn't notice it was Commons :-O If there's now a source, though, I reckon we can just remove the tag and forget all about it. ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 20:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

CSD Jack gretta

That was pretty clearly an attack page - not nonsense. Toddst1 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

? Does it really matter how I tag it, it still gets speedily deleted... It looked fairly nonsensical to me... ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 19:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, yes. If I deleted it with the wrong reason, someone could easily say I'm abusing admin privileges. (some people seem to make a sport of doing things like that) Also a page like that warrants a 4im message for defamation. Cyberbullying like that can have real-life consequences. Toddst1 (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Nobody would accuse you of abusing admin privileges for deleting that, really. If they did, they'd be ridiculed and rightly so! ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 19:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I've been given tons of crap for piddly little things like that. Anyway - I agree - not that big a deal. Cheers. Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

We know better

Hiya TreasuryTag. I'm having trouble understanding what Youknowbest is complaining about. His english doesn't seem too good. GoodDay (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

PS- Yes, blocking might be required. He/she seems to be toying with us. GoodDay (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I've no idea what they're complaining about but s/he looks like a POV-warrior to me :P The tone of their rants isn't that constructive, either. ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 15:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps it's time to block. GoodDay (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I definitely think it is - the thingy I quoted in my latest response on the Admins' Noticeboard is absurd. He'll almost certainly just start again after a short (24-48 hour) block, but that can be a fair warning, I guess! ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 15:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. GoodDay (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

CSD Buddhist influences on print technology

Is there a source that you believe is being violated in this article? A quick google check didn't come back with a match. Lacking that, I'd assume it was a school assignment. Toddst1 (talk) 16:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Possible; I just thought that a new user posting that amount of material in one edit, with strange formatting, must have been copy-pasted from somewhere. It'd have to be university, of course, though - what school teaches that sort of stuff? :-) ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 17:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		TreasuryTag, Thank you very much for your work on Youknowbest. It was an hour before sundown at the start of Shemini Atzeres and I made the decision to check Wikipedia "one last time" before I had to go to shul, when I ran into some edits that sorely needed attention. I did as much as I could in the little time I had, and I worried about how far he'd be able to go before I could get back to Wikipedia 2 days later. How relieved I was when I turned the computer back on 48 hours later to see you were on top of the issue. Shirulashem (talk) 00:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Always a pleasure - chag sameach! ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 06:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Republican marriage

Hi, your edit to Republican marriage was erroneous (you corrected "mariage" to "marriage" in the French translation, which is indeed spelled with one "r"). Please make a note of it. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Pardon me! I won't blame AWB, either! ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 06:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Youknowbest

FYI, I reopened the discussion about Youknowbest. Shirulashem (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - I was on the verge of that myself! ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 15:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

i knew i knew you!

I knew your username sounded familiar. Check this out (the second vote, Strong Keep). :-) Shirulashem (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Shahid_Hasan_Siddiqui

Hi, I'm sure that you're aware but the db-person tag you added to this page has been deleted. It has also now degenerated into a general rant about the individual and the US educational system. Thanks Nelson50^T 08:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me; I'm on it :-) ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 09:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I was searching whether there were any real sources on this guy, either to rewrite or take to AfD, and found it was a copyvio.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)