User talk:Travisarch

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Travisarch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Imzadi 1979 → 00:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Road junction lists not required

WP:RJL states "Most road articles should use a table to indicate junctions". There is no requirement. For something minor like SR-931 it seems unnecessary. I'm not going to revert because there's no point in removing it now, it won't improve WP by doing so. But if you insist on putting a list there for the southern segment, please add one for the northern. Mapsax (talk) 02:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in progress for adding it for the northern section.Travisarch (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Travisarch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana State Road 267

Your edit on Indiana State Road 267 had sunk source whatsoever of SR 267 being truncated to Interstate 70. Therefore, I have reverted your edits. If you think this is false, please provide a reliable source of the truncation.

Have a nice day :) EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to say no instead of sunk. EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does check SR 267 the first road is CR 700S just south of I-70 and also see. Travisarch (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, it has not been finalized EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, county roads can intersect state roads. EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It lists CR 700S as beginning of SR 267 and the RPB is from 2016.Travisarch (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, before I start getting mad, it has not been finalized. Do you not understand? EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one not understanding there is nothing to be finalized it is in the RPB look under SR 267. It clear states beginning route at intersection with CR 700S.Travisarch (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We fought over SR 22, and now SR 267. I don't want to fight. SR 267 still exists between I-70 and SR 42. Period. I live on the route in Mooresville anyway! EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last time you lived in Kokomo now Mooresville. With INDOT SR 267 has been removed. I found this when making some maps for Indiana State Road that SR 267 was listed as Old SR 267 and when I find the location of this file I will add that as well.Travisarch (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I said I drove into Kokomo on my way to South Bend for one. And two, IT HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED. GOD DAM EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there is an Old SR 267. SR 267 used to run west of its interchange with I-70, with no interchange. EBGamingWiki (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know were it has been removed at was at a different time. Look here] it has been removed. The solid black lines are state roads the solid black line end just south of I-70.Travisarch (talk) 02:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop. It's not finalized. Period. EBGamingWiki (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How about you look at the references above. It clear lists the section south of I-70, about 1 mile, as Old SR 267. click on the route south of I-70, about 1, and the route name is listed as Old SR 267. It has been removed from the state road system but when INDOT gives the road back it doesn't remove the signs that is the local highway/street departments job. Also if it is not part of the state road system it can't by state code IC 8-23-1 it can be a state road.Travisarch (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Do you not understan "Not Finalized"? It means it's not official. EBGamingWiki (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok let me walk you through this the news article is from 2015 and the RPB (link above) is from July 2016 the July 2015 listed it going to Mooreaville. So at some point INDOT gave the road to local control. The 2016 road see here has the line thickens as a county road not state road.Travisarch (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EBGamingWiki: It is official in Hendricks County check the county commission minutes from November 24, 2015 here on page 5 under the heading "IN THE MATTER OF 267" I will even copy it here:

"John Ayers reported he had received a revised relinquishment agreement from INDOT for 267, south of
Plainfield. He stated they have worked on the wording and it now appears to be acceptable, however, he has not had Attorney Greg Steuerwald review this latest revised agreement. There was discussion of the changes. Commissioner Palmer moved to approve the relinquishment agreement from INDOT for 267 south, of Plainfield,
subject to counsel review. Commissioner Whetstone seconded the motion and the motion was approved unanimously 3-0-0."

Mooresville approves SR 267 on this article from November 5, 2016.Travisarch (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 164

The article on I-164 contradicts itself in saying that it is a decommissioned route in one place, but still exists as a short segment in another place. Because of the short stretch that is still I-164, it should still show the route as current although it is unsigned. Also, saying that this is a former route does not agree with the List of auxiliary Interstate Highways, which marks it is a current route with a length of 0.69 miles. If in fact the highway was completely removed from the system, the part of the article that says that it still exists should be removed and the list of routes should be fixed. If you have questions about I-164 please contact User:Imzadi1979.

Here is proof that the highway still exists and was not removed: http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-164_in.html

Che-or (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Imzadi1979 and Che-or: Above would be WP:SPS and it isn't a good reference on Wikipedia. The Post Reference Book (RPB) from INDOT shows I-69 starting 0.69 west of US 41 and I-164 was completely removed. At the end of the RPB it even says something along the lines of removed references to I-164. Also Indiana Map shows the road west of US 41 as I-69, until it becomes a local roadway know as veterans memorial parkway. I know IndianaMap is not the best reference.Travisarch (talk) 00:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Travisarch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Travisarch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veterans Memorial Parkway (Evansville) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veterans Memorial Parkway (Evansville), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veterans Memorial Parkway (Evansville) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Veterans Memorial Parkway (Evansville)

Template:Attached KML/Veterans Memorial Parkway (Evansville) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]