User talk:Trannoyye
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Trannoyye, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zoroaster, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Remsense留 16:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Manifestation of God (Baháʼí Faith), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Geardona (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No religion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Your additions to the Australia article
[edit]Hello there
I reverted your recent addition of Sikhism to the info box and you reinstated it without seeking consensus on the Talk page. Please read policy on the bold, revert, discuss cycle: WP:BRD. If you make a bold edit and someone reverts it, you are obliged to start a discussion on the Talk page and seek consensus if you want the edit reinstated. If you don't do this, you could face sanctions. Also please read policy on the purpose of the info box: MOS:INFOBOX. The info box is meant to be a quick summary of the most important informationin the article. Of all the information in the article, I don't think a religion with less than 1% of the population is of such vital importance that it should be listed in the info box. You will see that I have summarised the information on religion in the info box so that only the 4 largest reponses are listed. Those seeking finer detail can go to the Religion section of the article or the linked article on Religion in Australia. That is what articles are for. I am happy to discuss further on the article's Talk page.
As for your addition of Indigenous languages, please read the article and you will see that there are various estimates of the number of Indgenous languages in Australia. It is misleading and against policy to pick one definition and highlight it in the info box. See policy on neutral point of view. WP:NPOV. Also, complex and contested issues are unsuitable for inclusion in the info box. MOS:INFOBOX Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- You have again restored your edits, even though there I asked you to discuss your addition here and on the article Talk page. Please state your case on the Talk Page. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- You have again tried to impose your own version of the religion section on the info box, even though there is an ongoing discussion on this issue on the Talk page and even though I have invited you several times to contribute to this discussion rather than make unilateral changes to the info box. Please carefully read policy on disruptive editing. Please go to the talk page and try to seek consensus for your preferred version of the info box. If you continue to ignore policy on the Bold, revert, discuss cycle I will reluctantly have to report you for disruptive editing. Please be a cooperative member of this community. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Final warning
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ahmadiyya. DMacks (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.