User talk:Trainzfan333

Welcome!

Hello, Trainzfan333, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 131st/Ellis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 00:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 131st/Ellis

The article 131st/Ellis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable bus terminal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 00:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to West Chicago, Illinois has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: West Chicago, Illinois was changed by Trainzfan333 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853064 on 2015-09-23T21:24:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Context, please

When you create an article like Walworth (metra), please remember that this is an international encyclopedia and not everyone who reads the article will have heard of "metra". Please remember to add some context to the lead sentence to clarify what and where it is. Thanks. PamD 21:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's worse: I don't know whether you're talking about Metra or METRA Transit System. PamD 21:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CTA Route 201

The article CTA Route 201 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bus route. No evidence of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Farm Expert 2016

The article Farm Expert 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eteethan (talk) 03:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Farm Expert 2016

The article Farm Expert 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AdrianGamer (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SuperMarioGlitchy4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SuperMarioGlitchy4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperMarioGlitchy4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 06:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PlayStation Park

The article PlayStation Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references for verifiability. Could find nothing on this in a basic google search. Since it refers to events in the future, the need for references is even greater than usual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Cat ‎ , but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Chile. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walworth (Metra station)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Walworth (Metra station), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rockford (Metra station)

The article Rockford (Metra station) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a seriously proposed station (Metra does operate within and is not funded by this county)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop "reopening" stations

Please stop saying closed "L" stations are going to reopen (or already have opened) that aren't. Wikipedia is based upon verifiability. I have repeatedly reverted edits by you claiming that Washington/State (upon others) will or have reopened. They haven't. CTA or the Chicago Department of Transportation would have made information on that abundantly available. As far as Asbury, no money has been acquired for the project as of yet and there is no guarantee that the station will be built. Once again, please stop doing this. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Lost on Belmont. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Washington (CTA Red Line station) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Cheyenne, Wyoming. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars Battlefront (2015 video game). -- ferret (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Washington station (CTA Red Line). Stop editing the Washington station article to use the present tense. You have been told about this. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]