User talk:Tragino

PF

I take it you are new to this because you havent added much on here. Dont start an edit war over this and next time you add a point on my talk page ADD YOU NAME!!!!!!!!!! (Archangel1 (talk) 22:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tragino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 11:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your message

Please note that I have replied to you on my talk page. Thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 15:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Market Garden

Did i hit a sore spot? Am so sorry - i applogise deeply that you are unable to read a comment hidden within the text that states not to add certain commanders to the list and read the talk page if you disagree. Again my deepest applogises.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regimental Police

Please, never, ever, switch redirects manually. Only do it by moving. You have now messed up the edit history. On the point of Regimental Police/Provost, yes they are called Provost Sergeants and Provost Staff. Royal Military Police companies are called Provost Companies and their senior officers are Provost Marshals and the RMP is sometime referred to collectively as the Provost (e.g. their official history, Bloody Provost). Does that mean we should move Royal Military Police to Royal Military Provost? RPs are called Regimental Police. They have always been called Regimental Police. A single, solitary reference in a report is not a reason to move an entire article to a name that is rarely used. In addition, note that the article is not just about RPs in Britain! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

British Army Man power

What your trying to do dosent make any sense, and I can obviously tell your new to DASA.

View source and click "View Entire Publication (PDF)" http://www.dasa.mod.uk/applications/newWeb/www/index.php?page=48&thiscontent=160&date=2010-03-02&pubType=1&PublishTime=09:30:06&from=home&tabOption=1

British army has 101,190 trained personel as seen on page 4 "Table 1 - Full time trained strengths and requirements of UK Armed Forces1"

However on page 6 "Table 2 - Strength of UK Armed Forces1 - full time trained and untrained personnel" this table includeds Trained and untrained personel and breaks them down in categories.

It Puts UK regular forces for the British army at 109,000+ and the trained strength of that at 96,000+ (note this doesnt include Gurkhas or FTRS like Table 1 does of page 4). The Gurkhas and FTRS of the British Army are included just below in Full Time UK Non-Regular Forces4 of which there are 6,080. You just them have to work out as to which service they fit into.

DASA doesnt make it easy hehehe, but make sure you know what your doing before you make edits next time ok. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rademire2 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modern equipment of the British Army

Hi you keep changing Challenger ARRV - I think if the British Army lists it as an engineering vehicle that's a reliable source. Can you list one that states its not an engineering vehicle ? Here is the link [1] --Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recce units

Good spot on the BRF in the Recce article. I wondered what your thoughts were on including the SRR in that article, given that the type of work they do isn't really reflected in the article. The issue is probably sourcing, the only wiki-reliable are newspapers and two books that date their descriptions from the 80s.

ALR (talk) 09:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

East Surrey Regiment

Hi Tragino

Thanks for attempting first aid on East Surrey Regiment. My original TNA ref is still damaged though. I'll fix it myself but please note my comments on User_talk:Terryleary first as I intend to revert the whole edit unless other supporting refs are forthcoming. Please see what you think if you have time. -- KenBailey (talk) 13:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tragino. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tragino. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tragino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]