User talk:Tradewinds5010

License tagging for Image:Jamietilly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamietilly.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Fencedingold.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fencedingold.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Seth Johnson

Hi! It looks like you're trying to move one or more pages. However, please stop doing that this way - the new name of the page might be good, but Wikipedia has another procedure for moving pages. Look at Help:Renaming (moving) a page: you need to use the move tab, and not cut and paste. Cut and paste moves don't take the edit history with them and thus violate the GDFL copyright terms. Also, in some cases, when the move might be controversial, you might first want to discuss the move on the article's talk page. If a move is not possible because a page with the new name already exists, go to Wikipedia:Requested moves. Thanks! Khoi khoi 05:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alantanner.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Alantanner.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alantanner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alantanner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Seth johnson (artist)

A tag has been placed on Seth johnson (artist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 04:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kianna Alarid

Please don't add unsourced personal information to articles, especially if the article is about a living person. Please see WP:BLP for more information. Based on the fact that you also created an article for Seth Johnson, I encourage you to also read WP:COI for more information on Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies if this is relevant. If you are affliated with Seth Johnson, I encourage you to contribute to one of the millions of articles on Wikipedia that are not related to that subject. Regardless, all information added to the encyclopedia should be verifiable. Please let me know if you have any questions. janejellyroll 01:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Alexia Thiele

A tag has been placed on Alexia Thiele, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 01:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina and Brad's children.

"famousbabesblog" is NOT a reliable source for a biography of living person article. Regardless of how true you feel the information may be, with an unreliable source it is not worth including in the article. Please do NOT readd such information with that kind of source again (to either possible parent's page) If it is really true, A reliable news source will have reported it by now. If/when they do, feel free to add the information and ref that instead.

Here is the Wikipedia policy regarding this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources

Nar Matteru (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Garner

I'd like to point out that it's been proven on Ben Affleck's page, that Violet's middle name is Anne, and Marie was removed because it's not one of her middle names. Also Seraphina was also born in L.A. same as Violet. http://celebrity-babies.com/2009/01/13/jen-and-ben-reveal-daughters-name-seraphina-rose-elizabeth/ 65.92.171.64 (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amelie Jolie-Pitt listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amelie Jolie-Pitt. Since you had some involvement with the Amelie Jolie-Pitt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk 22:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]