User talk:TracyElizabethWikipedia

Hello, TracyElizabethWikipedia, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding your edits to Template:Draft article

Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, you are editing the wrong location to start a new article about Robert Selman. You have been editing a Wikipedia maintenance template about draft articles instead of starting an actual draft article. Please see Wikipedia's document on creating your first article or use the Articles for Creation process if you want to start a draft article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 21:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Robert L. Selman

To provide a little more feedback on the draft: As I said yesterday via IRC, its sources largely are Selman's own writings, and the draft then provides your interpretation of those primary sources. A Wikipedia article should instead be a summary of what secondary sources - published reviews of Selman's works, articles about him published in newspapers and reputable magazines, maybe a festschrift - have reported about him. This goes particularly for interpretation, and for content that could be considered promotional. Significant parts of the draft don't cite any references, and if that were a live article I'd immediately add "[citation needed]" tags - for example, not even the primary sources connect Selman to My Little Pony, and at a glance I failed to find a source that confirms the connection. Phrases such as "is perhaps best known for X" would need a source that not only confirms Selman did X - but what he is best known for. If no such sources can be found, such phrases should be reworded. "Seminal work" could be seen as a peacock term and would again need a third-party source discussing the importance of the work in question. In general, a shorter, well-sourced article would be preferable over a long, weakly-sourced one. Huon (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert L. Selman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert L. Selman. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert L. Selman has been accepted

Robert L. Selman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)