User talk:TouristPhilosopher

Bookchin as green anarchist

Seems to me that Bookchin is a good example of an green anarchist. He's prominently noted on the page for Green anarchism and his Ecology of Freedom is often cited as a key text for the field. Cheers, --Dylanfly 20:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Janet Biehl's "Murray Bookchin's Break with Anarchism?" Best wishes, --TouristPhilosopher 16 October 2007

My sense is that Bookchin was an anarchist, published as an anarchist, contributed to anarchist theory, then decided (after many books) that there were better directions for society. But those late conclusions in life don't invalidate his earlier relationship to green anarchism. Cheers, Smilo Don 21:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To my mind he was an anarchist. The problem is that the people who call themselves anarchists today don't agree with me, with you or/and with Bookchin. Bookchin call them life-style anarchists. I agree with him. So for me its ok to call him a green anarchist but its real confused still call him anarchist after all his "fights" against the irrational and life-style trends of anarchism. I believe that Bookchin's anarchism has nothing to do with today's anarchism. So if we call Bookchin an (green) anarchist we have to find another label for today's "anarchistic" trends. No meaning. --TouristPhilosopher 18 October 2007

Deletions of categories in the Inclusive Democracy entry by Nihilo 01

Direct democracy is not -per se- the same that anarchism. Have a good day --Nihilo 01 (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchists & Inclusive Democracy

Nihilo 01, here are some anarchists who regard Inclusive Democracy worthwhile and @ their MySpace page provide links and texts of ID: UNI-COMM Anarchist Communism/Syndicalism --TouristPhilosopher (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer most serius refs. Sorry. --Nihilo 01 (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a kind of anarchist “guru” who judges who is serious anarchist and who is not? What about David Freeman, Jean-Claude Richard, Michael Levin? See [Deletions of categories in the Inclusive Democracy entry] mentioned by Panlis (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC) --TouristPhilosopher (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use a correct taxonomy (eg. A belongs to B, or B content to A) and MySpace isn't a reference.--Nihilo 01 (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moldova external links

Thanks, I wanted to do that a long time ago, but boredom had always set in as I even looked at the edit button of that section. --Illythr (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]