User talk:Toughdude

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Undoing the redirect which has been explained SEVERAL times and then leaving false warnings out of anger on my talk page is vandalism. You've been reported already, so I suggest chilling out. Thewtfchronicles (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Thewtfchronicles (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at SpongeBob's Truth or Square. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: please see AN3 report that led to the block. Abecedare (talk) 21:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toughdude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had been attempting to explain to this person that the need to dicuss this first but they kept refusing this page. Also if you look at SpongeBob's Atlantis SquarePantis it is the same kind of episode as SpongeBob's Truth or Square. So it can have and does not have to redirected. Also Bovineboy2008 siad discuss this first and please reach a concensus first. So I kept redirecting untill this person put this concern on the Discussion page intill we came to an agreement to to reirect this page. So I just wanted to keep this person from vandalising this page. Thank You

Decline reason:

I notice that User:Thewtfchronicles is also appealing the block, and is also saying that, since you were clearly vandalizing, his edit-warring is justified. My opinion is that neither of you is vandalizing, and both of you need to stop reverting each other's edits and discuss this- with each other and other editors- on the talk page. WP:DISPUTE might be helpful if you can't work it out. Edit-warring is always disruptive, and the rules against it apply even when we are sure we're right FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toughdude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I wasn't vandlisming the page. I was Just trying to stop the user from deleting the page.

Decline reason:

Per the reasons stated below. Both of your blocks will expire today and I see no reason to lift them early. TN X Man 15:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Good advice

Hello, User:Thewtfchronicles and User:Toughdude. Your blocks will both expire today, and you'll get to make decisions about what to do. I think you'll find that if you jump right back into the disagreement you were having, you'll be blocked again, for a longer period of time, and with little or no warning this time. Here's my suggestion: you should both start by discussing the situation on the article's talk page, and don't change the article at all until after you both agree together (and, if possible, with other people) about what the best version of this article would look like. Then, once you've agreed, make the edits you've agreed on. That way, the article is better, you both avoid getting blocked, and - who knows- two SpongeBob enthusiasts will go from WikiEnemies to Bestest WikiFriends. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman

Perhaps you are not aware of the practice of archiving old talk from talk pages, which is what I did with all content more than one month old on this page. It is now at Talk:FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman/Archive 1 and does not need to be added back onto the current talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

icarly

{{helpme}} Hey can you revert this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICarly&diff=325306840&oldid=325305611 and add this refference to ths http://twitter.com/DanWarp/status/5454382586 thanks

Twitter isn't counted as a reliable source of information, so it can't be used as a reference. As such, the specified edit cannot be reverted, as their is not realiable information showing the statement to be true. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I am trtying to get rid or this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_A_Bad_Boy because there is an article just like it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_a_Bad_Boy. The only difference is that the A is upercase and need to be loer case. So can you do this. Also for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iFight_Shelby_Marx and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly:_iDate_a_Bad_Boy and you change the name to iCarly: iDate Bad Boy and iCarly iFight Shelby Marx. For some reason it is not letting me do this. The show title is just spelled wrong thanksToughdude (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have sorted out the two "ICarly: iDate a Bad Boy" articles - I've made the "... A Bad" a redirect to "... a Bad". For the latter two, I have not changed them - the use of the colon appears to be intentional. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have re-read your question! The way Wikipedia works, all articles begin with a capital letter - hence the ICarly rather than iCarly. There is a way around this, so I'll try to sort it, and get back to you -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have now sorted it so that the title of the articles are "iCarly...." rather than "ICarly..." - as I said, the use of a capital letter at the beginning of article names is one of the restrictions of the Wiki software that we use, but there's a way around it! Regards, -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fetch! edits

Your edits to [[FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman are wrong. Before it premiered, the official FETCH! website said Season 4 would premiere September 11th, other than that, Season 4 premiered on WMFE on September 13th. So, please stop editing this incorrectly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anakiniman (talk • contribs) 17:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]