User talk:Totalrecallman

Hello,

Can you please provide a justification for your decision to revert the good faith changes I made to the Irish people article. I can think of no reason why mythology should be presented as historical fact in the opening paragraph of the article. The changes I made reordered the introduction of the article the present fact before legend like any encyclopedia should.

I have no interest in engaging in an edit war, but as you can see other editors have already moved to revert the changes you made. Please use the article's talk page to try to gain a consensus before making further changes to the opening paragraphs.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by GallaghersGreek (talk • contribs) 04:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry, im busy at the moment so i could not answer your message and im having some difficulties editing as my account has been blocked for some reason,,anyway the reason i reverted your edits is because it is not accurate to start the topic with an account of ethnically recent movements into Ireland,,be it mythology or not,,there must be an attempt to account for the ethnic groups who occupied Ireland before recorded history first.--Totalrecallman (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Prehistoric Ireland article provides an account of the people living in Ireland before the beginning of recorded history. The opening lines of the Irish people article link to this. This article is about the modern ethnic group and nation. It is entirely accurate to include details of other groups that have merged or joined to form the modern Irish nation in the introduction to this article. In my opinion, even any mention of legendary/mythological groups such as the Tuatha Dé Danann or the Milesians should only be included in the introduction at all with a very clear indication that there is no historical evidence whatsoever to suggest that they ever really existed.

I assume you are aware that your account has been blocked for sock puppetry. GallaghersGreek (talk) 05:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again for the late reply

In defining the Irish as a people you must take into account all factors i agree, but it is misleading to portray recent movements into Ireland and proposing that this is what makes up the Irish people as an ethnic group, there are many people now born in Ireland who are born of a second generation mixed Irish/Polish ancestry and they are Irish citizens but they are not entirely Irish either,If you cross reference your opening statement with modern genetics you will see that they do not match up, this is because Irish people have a deep genetic imprint from ethnic groups who were present in Ireland before recent movements onto the island, and this is what comprises them as a people--Totalrecallman (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 17:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Redbranch1984 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Totalrecallman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry i seem to have been mistaken for another user,will somebody please restore my editing ability

Decline reason:

Checkusers confirm that this is a sock account. only (talk) 12:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Totalrecallman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry there must be some kind of mistake,I have not made any edits but i have undone what i see as misinformation on the Irish people page and restored preexisting edits,maybe my account is showing different but it must be a mistake, i am quite new and i'm not sure what is happening--Totalrecallman (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's no misunderstanding. We believe on the basis of technical and other evidence that you are a sock. You haven't made any edits? What are these, then? Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Totalrecallman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am opening a new account under the name Brushshuffle,,there is some kind of mistake happening here,,Administrators are blocking my account with no clear reasons as to why they are doing so--Totalrecallman (talk) 01:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's block evasion. [stwalkerster|talk] 01:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no mistake at all. And there is a clear reason. You are blocked. You are not allowed to use other accounts. It's simple: you are not allowed in any way to be an editor on Wikipedia right now.