Jump to content

User talk:Toru-chan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Toru-chan please restore the infomercial section on Barry Marshall to the degree you feel appropriate, as I do not feel like wasting time in a revert/policy debate war with Trizow. Thanks! Mjk2357 01:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ibaraki Prefectural Police Campaign.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ibaraki Prefectural Police Campaign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008 (aka Collectonian needs to get a life)

[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Absolute Boyfriend. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Absolute Boyfriend. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop the spamming of a non-reliable source. Drama Wiki is a wiki. It is NOT a source, it is NOT an appropriate link. If you continue this spamming you will be blocked. If you want to make legitimate edits, do so without spamming. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Absolute Boyfriend, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well potentially being penalized by search engines. I have already told you repeatedly, that is NOT a valid source, nor is it an appropriate external link. You are spamming a fansite wiki that is closely associated with distributers of illegal copyrighted material. You have been reported. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Absolute Boyfriend. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collectonian, the links I added were perfectly valid and added to the value of article. You don't own that page. You seriously need to get a life.