User talk:Torshaw

Welcome!

Hello, Torshaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles unless the required changes have been made to the article. If you are uncertain whether the article requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the article's talk page before removing the notice from the article. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. Thank you. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 20:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to catagorize those articles, but please read Help:Category before attempting to catagorize articles again. Thanks. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 01:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Embers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Embers.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 03:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kelly mug shots.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Kelly mug shots.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. —A 07:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jimmy Keating.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy Keating.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. —A 07:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need to confirm copyright status ASAP

Several of your recent edits quote material from books by Terry R. Shaw. If you are that author, then please review Wikipedia:Copyrights and its supporting articles for the proper procedure for granting Wikipedia the rights to use your previously copyrighted material under its license. If you are NOT that author, or do not grant Wikipedia rights to the material in a timely fashion, all of your edits risk being deleted. Engineer Bob 06:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw-Allen-Shaw

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Shaw-Allen-Shaw article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -BinaryTed 17:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Defiants

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the The Defiants article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --BinaryTed 17:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text of Torshaw private email to Engineer Bob dated 3/8/06: "You flagged some articles of mine about bands (Defiants and/or Shaw-Allen-Shaw) concerning copyright infringment. I am the author of the books that this material is taken from. I OWN THE COPYRIGHT. Put my articles back please. Thank you."

For the record, I'm not the one who tagged the two specific articles you mention; I just posted an inquiry here on your talk page giving you the opportunity to explain. And while I think we all appreciate you sharing your knowledge, Wikipedia policy is pretty rigid on the use of copyrighted material from other sources. Here's my suggestion on how you might want to proceed:

Send a letter to the Wikipedia legal office that gives them the right to distribute the material under the GFDL -- this is explained under one of the links I provided above.
Once you've done that, you can revert any deleted articles yourself
Remove the source citation from the text of each article (some might consider it self-promotion)
Add a source citation on each article's talk page that indicates where previously published, and your assertion that you personally (and not your publisher) own the copyright

Unfortunately, if you don't give Wikipedia a solid legal leg to stand on, people will continue to flag your articles. Engineer Bob 06:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Big_Bro_Den.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Big_Bro_Den.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think before you link

In your article on The Great Willmar Minnesota Raid you included a number of links which don't go to the right place. For example the link Gibbon is a link to an article on the tree-swinging apes and not the town of Gibbon, Minnesota as you intended. You need to either write [[Gibbon, Minnesota]] or use "pipe links" such as, in this case, [[Gibbon, Minnesota|Gibbon]] which will link to the first part, before the pipe symbol ("|"), but display the second part, i.e. Gibbon. --Spondoolicks 20:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Willmar, Minnesota Raid

The Great Willmar, Minnesota Raid has been proposed for deletion. Please see the aricle for details. NickelShoe 22:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Willmar, Minnesota Raid. Please review WP:V and WP:NOT and contribute to the deletion discussion. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Important: Please read

Before you create any more articles, please please please read the following policies and guidelines: WP:NOT, WP:BIO, WP:VAIN.

You obviously have a very different idea of what is notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article to the rest of us and that is why I have proposed several of your pages for deletion. Also, please do not use Wikipedia to promote yourself, your book, your bands or members of your family. It is frowned upon for obvious reasons. --Spondoolicks 22:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights

The correct place to contest a copyright violation is at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Search for the relevant article and add a line explaining. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:GAR - 1885.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GAR - 1885.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an arguement why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dakota ~ ° 18:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Van Spence.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Van Spence.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an arguement why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dakota ~ ° 18:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images again

The remainder of your untagged uploads, some 40 in number, have almost all been tagged as "no source". You will need to act quickly to save them, otherwise they will be deleted in seven days, with no further notice. The warning notices above include information on how to list all of your uploads so you can work on them. Stan 02:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:1900_Football_team_w_young_spence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1900_Football_team_w_young_spence.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Balloon_1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Balloon_1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

As a fellow editor from Minnesota, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry you've had a tough reception here in some ways. I hope it doesn't drive you away; you've added some good stuff. (And we have a policy against biting the newbies.) It was a close decision, but your T. Shaw articles got deleted. If you like, though, I can move the information from them to your user page. Let me know if you want that. Regards. Jonathunder 23:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Beach_slide.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Beach_slide.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Brightwood_boats_1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Brightwood_boats_1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Username signature use in Wikipedia articles

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please, however, refrain from using your username signature in Wikipedia articles. Username signatures are used for talk (discussion) pages only. --Kurt 00:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Perry Como. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Netsnipe 13:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Calvary Lutheran Church (Willmar, Minnesota)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Calvary Lutheran Church (Willmar, Minnesota), by 24.4.253.249 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Calvary Lutheran Church (Willmar, Minnesota) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Calvary Lutheran Church (Willmar, Minnesota), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Charles LaVere

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Charles LaVere, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://alevy.com/lavere.htm. As a copyright violation, Charles LaVere appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Charles LaVere has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Charles LaVere and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Charles LaVere with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Charles LaVere.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Tim Pierce (talk) 14:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Truck Drivin' Man"

A tag has been placed on "Truck Drivin' Man" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. i B e n 16:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GAR postcard.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GAR postcard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Defiants

The article The Defiants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a WP:YAMB, except from the pre-MySpace era. The article fails WP:BAND; they did get inducted into a Hall of Fame, but only a local one which doesn't have a Wikipedia article, therefore conferring little in the way of notability. None of the band members are notable for their musical careers; Mike Shaw was apparently a heart surgery patient, again, this doesn't make his band notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Defiants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Defiants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Defiants (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van Spence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Spence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Spence (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]