User talk:Toronto2503
if you wish to appeal this block you may contact ArbCom by email as detailed at WP:BASC
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome[edit]
Kingston[edit]Hi - You might want to take a look at the categorizing, title, and structure of articles like Portsmouth, Kingston before creating more. Clubmarx (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC) Milton's population[edit]Hi Toronto2503 - unfortunately the population updates you provided to Milton, Ontario are uncited/unsupported, and have been reverted. We rely on the most recent Census population figures as they represent the most recent complete counts of people, although supportable estimates are usually accepted as supplemental information. When the 2011 Census population data becomes available, you are welcome to help us update articles with that information. PKT(alk) 17:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Toronto2503, do you have a reliable source for the population figure you want to use? DigitalC (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hwy43 (talk) 22:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milton, Ontario, you may be blocked from editing. Hwy43 (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC) August 2011[edit] You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for This is due to your continuing to WP:Edit war on the Milton, Ontario page. Discuss with other editors first.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:50, 6 August 2011 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for Your block has been reset due to your use of a sockpuppet. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Toronto2503.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)The article East Bayridge, Kingston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 17:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)indefinitely blocked[edit]For persistent sockpuppetry and apparent gross incompetence. See [1] Beeblebrox (talk) 01:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Nomination of Burleigh Hill, St. Catharines for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burleigh Hill, St. Catharines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.