User talk:Topquark22

Hello!

June 2012

Hello, Topquark22, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tiderolls 06:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Commonly misspelled words

Your recent edit to this article was added to a section titled "Documented list of common misspellings" (emphasis mine). The list is not meant to be all-encompassing, but a list of those misspellings that are documented and sourced. Regards Tiderolls 06:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

Thanks for your contrubtions to Wikipedia (though I haven't yet checked them out ;-). I noticed, because I care about WP:MEDGA2013 that circumcision was now a GA with disputed neutrality. I also noticed you haven't edited in a while. Welcome back. I was thinking there could be a website with external discussion that might explain why you decided to edit here. I thought I might be able to take into consideration the concerns of those people discussing things, if that was indeed the case. If not, what are your concerns? I assume you arrived because the article recently received a GA status or had disputed neutrality. I could be wrong in that assumption! Anyhow, best wishes and happy editing! Biosthmors (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I arrived to add the important new information about the penile sensitivity reduction study (Bronselaer 2013) and the important Taylor study about the ridged band of the penis (which should certainly be part of the circumcision article.) Unfortunately, my important edits were removed within an hour by "AnomieBot." What is going on here? The Taylor information has been out for 17 years and certainly ought to be included. The new sensitivity article surely should be included. Topquark22 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)