Jump to content

User talk:Topher385/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You helped me before Tohper385...

[edit]

I Topher, you helped me in the past to improve the quality of a page I was involved with, so I wondered if you had any tips for a page I recently submitted to the AFC queue? (no worries if you are too busy!) Its Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Invitation_Digital_Ltd - Thanks either way MikeGracia (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I like your comments. twiter is the best (talk) --Twiter is the best (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)LakshyaTwiter is the best (talk) (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)--[reply]

I have revamped a request for Paul Gilmartin's page

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Paul_Gilmartin

I was wondering what process I would need to go through to get this published, as he has been in the public eye for 16 years. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranialspasm (talkcontribs) 00:50, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing your article again and doing some research of my own, it seems that this person fails the criteria set forth here for notability of entertainers. Unless you can find sources that prove otherwise, I'm afraid that your article is unlikely to be accepted. Topher385 (talk) 01:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying! I have a few questions/comments in regards to the Notability criteria for Wiki. "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" - Dinner and a Movie was on TBS from 1995-2011 and was played repeatedly during those 16 years. I thought that was prolific enough. All of his co-hosts have pages.

I'm also having difficulty understanding what totals are considered a 'significant "cult" following'. His personal account on twitter https://www.twitter.com/gilmartini has 1,847 followers His podcast account on twitter https://twitter.com/mentalpod has 2,769 followers His character account (for one of his regular sketch personas) https://twitter.com/OhioCongressman has 2,276 followers His podcast facebook page https://www.facebook.com/mentalpod has 1,168 likes His personal facebook account https://www.facebook.com/paul.gilmartin.543/info has 1,806 friends. Should he create a professional facebook page instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranialspasm (talkcontribs) 22:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While his contributions to Dinner and a Movie are impressive and long-lived, I'm not sure I would consider that particularly prolific. However, that is my personal opinion so other editors might judge it differently. Also, having a few thousand twitter and facebook followers hardly gives him a cult following. Examples of a cult following might include such things as the movies Clockwork Orange or The Rocky Horror Picture Show. I hope that helps. Topher385 (talk) 00:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His podcast (The Mental Illness Happy Hour) gets 200,000 downloads a month. Does that help? http://mentalpod.libsyn.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranialspasm (talkcontribs) 08:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the ACC Team!

[edit]

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the account creation guide and our username policy thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts connect on Freenode, where you can get advice on handling requests, and you may also wish to subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions between the account creation team. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC. Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. Again, welcome! —Joshua Issac (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

edit

I NEED HELP!

[edit]

Hi Topher385:

I have made changes and added secondary sources to Court Dunn Wikipedia article last week. However, the changes I have saved didn't seem to get sent to you. Please let me know if you have seen the recent changes, and if these sources are plausible enough to make it to Wikipedia. Thank you again. I look forward to hearing from you and receiving your guidance!

Flygirl121 (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell, you added one more source that mentions him and a few scant details about him, but it still doesn't establish his notability. While most of your sources could be used to verify certain facts in your article, you will also need several independent sources that are about him and don't simply mention him in passing. These sources might include newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, etc. I hope that helps. Don't hesitate to let me know if you have anymore questions. Topher385 (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

songhor kolyai

[edit]

Dear Editor: I request that you kindly reconsider the decision to decline publication of the submitted article. You have based your decision on the claim that an article already exists under the name Songhor. While I agree with this statement, Songhor-Kolyai does not currently exist. The information provided in the existing article under "Songhor" is incomplete at best and frankly inaccurate and misleading. For the sake of future users of this great public information resource, I strongly urge you to publish the submission Songhor-Kolyai. Best Regards, Nader Sinaii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsinai59 (talkcontribs) 01:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there and thanks for your contributions! It was actually another reviewer that declined it based on that reason, but I will try to explain anyway. It is clear that the subject of your article already exists here. The great part about Wikipedia is that you can improve the existing article without having to make another. In fact, that is preferred over creating new articles if one already exists. If you choose to improve the existing article, remember to use reliable sources. Once you find those, click that edit button and make Wikipedia better! Topher385 (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, Sonyghor-Kolyai does not currently exist in wikipedia. I spent a lot of time gathering sources after the inciteful feedback I received following my initial submission. At that time the editor requested sources and s/he made no mention of the topic already existing, because it did not and still does not. What you have under "songhor" is a collection of totally inacurate and misleading statements. I do not understand whay you recommend adding my well sourced contribution to an unrelated and unreliable article. I strongly believe that your that valued readers deserve better and will be well served if my article "Songhor=Kolyai" is added to the encyclopedia. Once again I respectfullt urge you to reconsider your decision. Best Regards,Nsinai59 (talk) 01:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Nader[reply]
I understand your frustration, but as I said above, I was not the one who declined your article on that basis. The name of that reviewer was IceUnshattered. I might suggest taking up your concerns with him/her. Topher385 (talk) 01:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got your comment on my talk page, but you seem to have missed adding the result to the project page. (Sorry for the duplicate submission btw. I messed up) --Frederico1234 (talk) 05:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like I did. Maybe we're looking at different pages? Topher385 (talk) 00:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking at WT:Articles for creation/Automatic Reference Counting. It only has the results for the two earlier submissions. I expected a third to show up. --Frederico1234 (talk) 06:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Museo Provinciale di Torcello was declined by you in July. At that time, there was concern because some of the material seemed to be copy pasted from a source subject to copyright. The copyright owner attempted to provide a license, but did not write the first permission statement correctly. I suggested how it needed to be written, but my email received an automate response, not in English, that I believe was a message that the recipient was away, This morning, the person responded, and has provided a proper permissions statement for the source material. I'm sharing this with you in case it "dropped off your radar" due to the length of time without a response.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update!Topher385 (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on at Timothy Hahn. I see a number of refernces, many of which are dead, and the ones that are not, are talking about Eric Hutchinson--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like someone was arbitrarily changing information about the subject which is why I reverted the edits. However, I agree that is seems to be a copy/paste job after closer inspection and definitely support the AfD nomination as a result. Topher385 (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I wondered if I was missing something obvious (which happens more often than I care to admit.) But I searched a little more after posting to you, and became convinced.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alfredo L. Escalera Article (pending for re-revision)

[edit]

We have added some new secondary sources. among the new sources we added information and quotes from Bradenton Herald Newspaper, AOL Sporting News, Fox/St. Joseph News-Press, The Baltimore AA Newspaper, Associated Press, El Nuevo Dia Newspaper and Primera Hora Newspaper. We have other News reports and Magazine articles written on Mr. Escalera but those are not available via internet. If you need then in order to get the article approve, please let us know how could we make them available to you ? Thanks

Igmiw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igmiw (talkcontribs) 03:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog

[edit]
Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1495 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

DRN needs your help!

[edit]

Hey there Topher385, I noticed that you haven't been very active at the dispute resolution noticeboard lately where you listed yourself as a volunteer - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to comment at Monty Hall problem RfC

[edit]

Because of your interest in dispute resolution,, I am inviting you to comment on the following RfC:

Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?

This dispute has been going on for over ten years and there have been over 1,300,000 words posted on the article talk page (by comparison, all of the Harry Potter books together total 1,084,170 words). Over the years the dispute has been through multiple noticeboards, mediators, and even the Arbitration Committee without resolving the conflict, so a lot of wisdom is needed here. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Dawn Bright page

[edit]

Hi,

I couldn't find your comments section as to why this page keeps getting declined? Although I'm not sure if it is declined because i can pull it up online?

Also, when i pull it up online, it has this notification box that says "This biographical article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. (August 2012)"

Can you please tell me which specific parts need additional citations so i can get that box removed? I feel like we did a good job providing enough (legitimate) sources, especially for her discography. And i've researched a couple wiki pages that have been approved and they also have the same amount of citations even in the background/early career/personal life sections such as the following wiki pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makeba_Riddick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnie_McKee

Please advise, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smacint (talkcontribs) 00:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1495 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

Article for Laurence Kirwan

[edit]

Hi, I have reviewed your comments and don't agree with your comments that this is not notable person. Please could you revise your review and perhaps let me know what need to be edited. I have seen so many article which posted about people nowhere near to the person in my article. Please don't take me wrong but I also noticed that you decline most articles. Please could you review it again. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Laurence_Kirwan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dendik5 (talkcontribs) 12:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution volunteer survey

[edit]

Dispute Resolution – Volunteer Survey Invite


Hello Topher385. To follow up on the first survey in April, I am conducting a second survey to learn more about dispute resolution volunteers - their motivations for resolving disputes, the experiences they've had, and their ideas for the future. I would appreciate your thoughts. I hope that with the results of this survey, we will learn how to increase the amount of active, engaged volunteers, and further improve dispute resolution processes. The survey takes around five to ten minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have either listed yourself as a volunteer at a dispute resolution forum, or are a member of a dispute resolution committee. For more information, please see the page that describes my fellowship work which can be found here. Szhang (WMF) (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1495 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered 00:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Notice to DR/N volunteers! Dispute resolution discussions need attention

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there are currently discussions at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard which require the attention of a volunteer. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. Below this message is the DR/N status update.

You are receiving this notification to request assistance at the DR/N where you are listed as a volunteer. The number of cases has either become too large and/or there are many cases shaded with an alert status. Those shaded pink are marked as: "This request requires a volunteer's attention". Those shaded blue have had a volunteers attention recently

Case Created Last volunteer edit Last modified
Title Status User Time User Time User Time
Talk:Hardeep Singh_Nijjar Failed Southasianhistorian8 (t) 17 days, 1 hours Robert McClenon (t) 2 days, 19 hours Robert McClenon (t) 2 days, 19 hours
Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov In Progress Trumpetrep (t) 6 days, 5 hours Robert McClenon (t) 2 days, 19 hours Robert McClenon (t) 2 days, 19 hours
Eastern Tennessee seismic zone Closed Mccunicano (t) 1 days, 2 hours Robert McClenon (t) 22 hours Robert McClenon (t) 22 hours
Breyers New Zefr (t) 3 hours None n/a Zefr (t) 3 hours

If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 19:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It needs you, but it needs you to do it right. You declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Olivier Dunrea as a "test edit", which it clearly is not. It's an incorrectly written article about someone actually notable--his books are in thousands of libraries, and they've been reviewed, which meets the standards for WP:AUTHOR. Actually reading the article would have shown that--it's tempting but not safe to go by impressions.

What the contributor needs is some directed help for rewriting the article in our proper format. I'll give him some.I hope he's still around, or we will have lost a contributor, and, unless I rewrite it, an article on a missing highly notable person. Myself, I find the prebuilt reasons rarely sufficient, and usually write a custom reason. But sometimes they do apply, but even so it's necessary to select the right one. DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRN organisers

[edit]

Hello. I am just letting you know that I've made a proposal to create a rotating DRN organiser-style role that would help with the day-to-day running of DRN. As you are a listed volunteer at DRN, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this, and the other open proposals at DRN. You can read more about it here. Thanks! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 00:19, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 12:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

DRN needs your help!

[edit]

Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The new face of DRN: Topher385

[edit]

Recently the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard underwent some changes in how it operates. Part of the change involved a new list of volunteers with a bit of information about the people behind the names.

You are listed as a volunteer at DRN currently, to update your profile is simple, just click here. Thanks, Cabe6403(TalkSign) 17:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duncan McClure Fisher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitbyte Digital Media AfC

[edit]

Hi Topher385. I see you approved the Zeitbyte Digital Media AfC draft. I have nominated it for speedy deletion now.

The current refs include:

The LA Times blog article is just a passing mention. Do you see significant coverage in reliable sources, at least one of which is a mainstream source?

Sadly, I am not watching your talk. If possible, please reply by moving this conversation to my talk.

Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your involvement with DRN

[edit]

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Duncan McClure Fisher

[edit]

Hello Topher385. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Duncan McClure Fisher.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duncan McClure Fisher}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog Drive

[edit]

Hello, Topher385:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

[edit]

Hello Topher385! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fractional Differential Equation, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Topher385. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fractional Differential Equation".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fractional Differential Equation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

[edit]

Hello Topher385:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (tJosve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DRN needs assistance

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Help needed at DRN

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]