User talk:Toolsmain

September 2007

Diana, Princess of Wales

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Diana, Princess of Wales. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Sam Blacketer 12:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changing "car accident" to "murder" in above article

Please review the following policies and guidelines: A core policy of Wikipedia is neutrality. This is backed up by verifiability and reliable sources. Your opinion may be different than the known facts. Changing "car accident" to "murder" in the above article is not constructive, and is not supported by facts, or verifiable sources. Please do not continue this effort to change these wordings, instead, please find a way to contribute constructively. Thank you sincerely, ^Ariel♥Gold 13:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Sam Blacketer 13:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toolsmain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not abusing multiple accounts. I don't even know what that means.

Decline reason:

I find it a bit hard to believe you don't understand the meaning of the phrase "abusing multiple accounts", as it is pretty plain. Additionally, this seems like a pretty obvious case, as seen in the history of the Diana article. — Vassyana 13:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.