User talk:TookieBahookie

Mick Wingert

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mick Wingert, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.mickwingert.com/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Mick Wingert

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mick Wingert, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mickwingert.com/bio.html. As a copyright violation, Mick Wingert appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mick Wingert has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mick Wingert and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Mick Wingert with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mick Wingert.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mick Wingert. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Mick Wingert. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Joel McHale. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 10:17, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Whoa! Slow down there! Your edits are clearly causing concern for other editors. In fact, you've been reported to WP:AIV because other editors regard your edits as vandalism. I'm not so sure, but you do need to be careful. Discuss your edits on the articles' talk pages, or with other editors, or with me. Otherwise, the next admin to post here may well be informing you that you've just been blocked...

Cheers, TFOWR 11:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coy Stewart

A tag has been placed on Coy Stewart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onelifefreak2007 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SummerPhD (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nick Persons

The article Nick Persons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply not notable. No coverage in independent reliable sources. Bad stub created by returning sock.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Onelifefreak2007 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mick Wingert

I have nominated Mick Wingert, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Wingert. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]