User talk:Tonyprescott

Hello, and welcome to wikipedia. Welcome!

Hello, Tonyprescott, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Verbal fluency test. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Revert

I have red some of your publications on verbal fluency since I am in the way of publishing something similar to your works. Your knowledge is most welcomed to this article or any others you may edit. However I have just reverted one of your additions to the verbal fluency article: The reason is that the list of verbal fluency examples you inserted is unreferenced and will constitute original research (See WP:NOR). As I am a neuropsychologist I know it is true, however, unless you provide a reference for the specific example it does not belong to wikipedia. A possibility could be to add instead the mean number of words said by children at different ages or clinical populations (and a reference). If you have any questions feel free to ask at my talk page. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continue working on it because you have done a great job. Do not doubt to contact me if you want anything. You might also find interesting to join a wikiproject (See Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine and Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology), since there you can find people interested in collaborating in similar topics. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 16:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rereading your contributions I think we will have to be careful to explictily say that all what you have written only applies for semantic fluency tests, but not phonetic fluency.Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is perfect. The article has been greatly improved. Additionally NOR policity is usually not so tight regarding images compared to text.--Garrondo (talk) 06:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]