User talk:Tonymessinajr

Welcome!

Hello, Tonymessinajr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 05:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tonymessinajr. You have new messages at 2602:306:3061:9990:A559:93F9:3985:5A39's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 05:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion: Separation of church and state

Here I have reverted two of your three recent edits to the Separation of church and state article, as this appears to be WP:original research. Please read that WP policy. Please also read MOS:NOTE. and MOS:BOLD. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

well, I'm telling you that the record shows the information that I posted to be correct, if  you look at the record you would see that this is true, if you want an encyclopedia that is "correct", then why do you remove my post without researching it to any degree?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3061:9990:A487:1960:2A6B:178B (talk) 03:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tonymessinajr: The way Wikipedia works is that it includes facts in articles that have been written about by reliable, third party sources. This page helps explain what a reliable source is. Basically, you can't analyze an original document/piece of evidence and provide your own conclusion as to what the evidence shows. That is called original research, and is not allowed. Rather, you'll need to find a reputable source who has already done that analysis, and cite their work instead. I hope this makes sense. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 03:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]