User talk:Tonyjenkins450
May 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bubba Ray Dudley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 23:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Tonyjenkins450, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Tonyjenkins450! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
May 2018
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Morrison (wrestler). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Prefall 22:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jerry Lynn, you may be blocked from editing. Prefall 22:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Kendrick. Prefall 23:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of OGz
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on OGz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ike1x (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
June 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ronhjones (Talk) 15:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)General sanctions
[edit]You have been warned repeatedly about disruptive editing in the past but have continued to make similar edits. Please note that WP:general sanctions are now imposed on Professional wrestling articles—see WP:GS/PW for more information. Further disruptive editing will force me to report you, possibly leading to a loss of editing privileges within this topic.LM2000 (talk) 04:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Alberto Del Rio, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RF23 (talk) 02:54, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Blocked indefnitely
[edit]Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tonyjenkins450, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Prefall 09:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tonyjenkins450, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.