Locke Cole: "your behavior has been deplorable during this dispute" (twice) "and I am strongly considering requesting arbitration over your conduct"; "You know very well why this RFC is here Tony, just because you attempted to sabotage it doesn't give you divine right to have only your RFC. Besides, unlike your RFC this one encourages discussion, not voting."
Problem is, you guys never engage with the actual analysis: this is very possbily because you have nothing to add or contradict. There are sweeping denegrations of the analysis and its author, but that will convince no one. Watch this space, and I'll bet anyone that such silence will continue. Tony(talk)08:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
