User talk:Tono Fonseca

Hi Tono Fonseca, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 11:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Your recent edits

You seem to have changed "white" to "European" in several instances where the context is clearly not talking about the latter; in particular, in New Zealand and America. This is incorrect, and I have reverted these edits.
You have also changed sourced descriptions such as "neo-nazi" and "racist" to less loaded terms; whilst I understand you may well be wanting to achieve neutral terminology with those edits, the fact is that they are properly sourced.
It helps other editors to understand why you are making these changes if you leave a brief edit summary to explain them.
I would advise that before making any such sweeping edits in future, you make discuss such edits on the Talk pages of the relevant articles. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 19:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop altering and neutralizing statements that are cited. Mjpresson (talk) 14:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hezbollah. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Lihaas (talk) 12:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. -M.Nelson (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Governance (think tank)

The article Christian Governance (think tank) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no secondary sources; included references are from the organization itself

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. First Light (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]