User talk:Tonk111

Tonk111, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tonk111! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, I'm My Lord. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of terrorist incidents in India without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ML⁹¹¹ 07:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taj Mahal

Hi. About Taj Mahal, I could find this as well. What do you think of that? Ahmad^Talk 20:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay. But the objective of Oak as I see isn't to describe Taj, but to claim it for Hinduism. Not that it isn't visible from his book's title. Since you have a better book not trying to push any agenda; it is alright. Tonk111 (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, added the new reference. Thanks for your attention, I didn't know that. Ahmad^Talk 20:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kamlesh Tiwari. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone actually gay might not be insulting but using it as a retort is. And what he said "Prophet Muhammad was the first homosexual". Obviously historically baseless, homosexuality has existed long before him. This is an insult, nothing more. Tonk111 (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kamlesh Tiwari, you may be blocked from editing. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 10:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Tonk111. You have new messages at Talk:Kamlesh_Tiwari#Names of Suspect being taken.
Message added 10:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBig Xrayᗙ 10:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tonk111 reported by User:Harshil169 (Result: ). Thank you. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 11:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--DBig Xrayᗙ 11:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Harshil169

Hello, Tonk111. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
Message added 06:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Administrator had warned you for your behaviour and edits. Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned. Three reverts are allowed, so no violation on the 3RR end. Please continue to discuss on the article talk page. That having been said, Tonk111, some of your edits are highly problematic for a recently deceased person — you should be aware that you are a risking an imminent topic ban (or at the very least, an article ban), or other discretionary sanctions, if these violations were to persist. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 06:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]