User talk:Tongueey

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Prickjabber. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sticky Parkin 21:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prickjabber

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prickjabber, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Icewedge (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Prikjabber

A tag has been placed on Prikjabber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 21:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Prickjabber

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Prickjabber, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~SIS~~ 22:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Prickjabbers"

A page you created, Prickjabbers, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

The page you have tried to create multiple times is not encyclopedic, and will not be created unless it becomes notable, through coverage in reliable sources. If it does so, please take the discussion to deletion review. Take some time to read through the links below to learn how to edit Wikipedia productively. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tongueey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

blocked

Blocked indefinitely for repeatedly creating nonsense articles. Academic Challenger (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to City Technology College, Kingshurst. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~SIS~~ 22:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]