User talk:TomyDuby
Welcome
[edit]Hello, TomyDuby, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Chris53516 (Talk) 14:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Summary request
[edit]When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. — Chris53516 (Talk) 14:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Dvořák's wife
[edit]Thanks! (Two months belatedly :) ) Re Anna Dvořáková - I've seen this surname given at another point given to a descendant of Dvořák's rather than to his wife's but will have a look at the biography of course. And in regards the myth (and it has grown into one in the strict sense whether true or false :) ) in question - documentary primary sources are hopefully still available, and are the main thing even if they don't always allow a conclusive judgment. Will be happy to look into that too (soon)- interesting topic in the life of a wonderful and influential composer. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
The < math > environment
[edit]Hi, I would like to direct your attention to the Manual of Style (mathematics). In general, it is not a good idea to force PNG rendering of math formulas that are displayed inline. This can cause text alignment issues, so it typically is better to use either the \scriptstyle environment or wiki markup to render mathematical formulas inline. If you want to force PNG rendering, it is generally a better idea to do it on a separate line. Thanks, and happy editing! siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 22:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Each editing I did I tested and the displayed PNG rendering was much better than one without it. I did this editing because I found in another place a recomendation to force PNG rendering for those formulas that come up incorrectly displayed. TomyDuby (talk) 01:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- If the formula doesn't display correctly, I think it is better to use wiki markup syntax. Thus, if you don't like the way looks, then you should mark it up like this: c(t) = (x(t),y(t)) rather than forcing the rendering like this . In general, this should only be done as a last resort, when a formula cannot be suitably typeset by other means. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 01:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- OK. I am accepting your point.TomyDuby (talk) 11:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- If the formula doesn't display correctly, I think it is better to use wiki markup syntax. Thus, if you don't like the way looks, then you should mark it up like this: c(t) = (x(t),y(t)) rather than forcing the rendering like this . In general, this should only be done as a last resort, when a formula cannot be suitably typeset by other means. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 01:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Equation Ref template
[edit]No, not yet. I have another idea for it, but if that doesn't work, I don't know what will. Jkasd 01:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- It appears to have been fixed by silly rabbit. See new documentation here: Template:EquationRef. Jkasd 23:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Polygon Diameter
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Polygon Diameter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Samuel Tan 10:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- Saw your message on Talk:Polygon Diameter. Well, I was just following a Wikipedia guideline (WP:NAD) in proposing deletion. Anyway, I see that the articles have been merged now. Probably better this way. Cheers! -Samuel Tan 01:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean "the articles have been merged now"? I still see no "polygon diameter" in Polygon. TomyDuby (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Style manuals
[edit]Hello. Please see my edits to random Fibonacci sequence. It is incorrect to capitalize the iniitial "s"; see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Also, one should use complete sentences and set the title phrase in bold early in the article. And some initial context-setting, at least telling the lay reader that mathematics is what it's about, is needed. Michael Hardy (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. Accepted. TomyDuby (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Julius Weingarten
[edit]Hello. At some time in the very near future, you should add to the article on Julius Weingarten some reason to consider him notable enough to be the topic of an encyclopedia article. Otherwise, those who concern themselves with such things will tag the article for speedy deletion. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- (User talk:Michael Hardy): Done. Some more will be coming.TomyDuby (talk) 07:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Gauss–Codazzi equations
[edit]User Talk:Silly rabbit: Thanks for your corrections!!! TomyDuby (talk) 07:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Three-leaved clover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Three-leaved clover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Travelling Light, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
[edit]good Parshuram.koirala2 (talk) 12:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, TomyDuby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TomyDuby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TomyDuby. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fox (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for April 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Compartmental models in epidemiology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Logistic equation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haas (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Haas.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macmillan Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Resolved 14-Nov-21, TomyDuby (talk) 08:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC).
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for October 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smythe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Smythe, William Smythe and Peter Smythe.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)