User talk:Tommy55

Image tagging for Image:Soleanna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Soleanna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:KNUXRouge!.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KNUXRouge!.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:KNUXRouge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KNUXRouge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rouge the Bat

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Rouge the Bat, you will be blocked. GrandMasterGalvatron 15:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knuckles the Echidna

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Knuckles the Echidna. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bean915 00:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Knuckles and Rouge

Alright...I'm about sick and tired of your rule breaking edits so let's get some things straight.

1. There IS a close connection between Shadow and Rouge. Knuckles/Rouge is very much being phased out in favor of Shadow/Rouge and there are plenty of in game moments illustrating this. Whether you like it or not, deleting Shadow's section from Rouge's article is unacceptable.

2. Knuckles's feelings toward Rouge are for the most part, unknown. Sonic X only counts for Sonic X and not for the games. Stop adding this stuff about Knuckles loving her because from what we can see, he doesn't.

3. Another thing, I like Knuckles just as much as you do, maybe more. But that doesn't change the fact that he is the THIRD most wanted character for return appearances, not the first. METAL SONIC is first, Shadow is second, Knuckles was third. However, Knuckles DID get first place for "third favorite character" and that's cited...just as much as Metal Sonic's victory over him is cited. Just face the facts and quit adding the fancruft.

You've got to stop all of these non helpful edits, otherwise you're the one that's gonna get blocked from editing. I have reverted your changes for the reasons stated above. If I have to do it again, I'm gonna have to report you for blocking. Please go and look up Wikipedia's rules on speculation and NPOV.GrandMasterGalvatron 21:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure if I'm allowed to participate in this, so GMG, you can delete this if you want. Tommy, listen, your edits are of your own opinion. I'm not saying you're incorrect, Knuckles might like Rouge, but you must use a real reference. He might love her in Sonic X or whatever (only watched two episodes), but Sonic X is in a different universe. Now, you're leaving these comments on your edits that constantly say things like "I'll get you banned", don't. You have neither the power nor the reason to "get" someone banned. There is no dialouge in Sonic Adventure 2 or in Heroes that is even similar to flirting, "what's next for you Rouge, off to grab those jewels you love so much?" is not flirting, it is (at the most) teasing. You cannot mark that as official, as that's your speculation. Before I ditch this part of the topic, GMG, your remark on the phasing out, while seemingly true, is your own opinion, as well as Shadow/Rouge. I don't mean to sound like I'm an admin or anything, especially to YOU, but still. Next, Tommy, I can understand you like Knuckles, and think he's cool and whatnot, but just because YOU like him the most, doesn't mean the world does. Wikipedia works by reporting information that has been given from official sources, like the games and sites. The people WHO MAKE Sonic have said that Knuckles is, by official polls, the third most wanted to appear in games. Even if you have a reliable site, or whatnot, you cannot mark him as the most wanted, Sonic Team says Metal Sonic is, so Metal Sonic is. You cannot change the minds of others. Please, if you wish to make any edits that seem even SLIGHTLY incorrect, ask about them on the discussion page for that article. Do so by clicking the "discussion" tab in the upper left, right next to the "article" tab, which is next to the Wikipedia picture. Thanks, have fun on the Wiki. -Chao9999 00:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's certainly a lot going on between Shadow and Rouge...look at 06 and Rivals. I'm not saying they're a couple, I'm just saying they appear to be getting closer. Also, I fixed your statement a bit. Metal Sonic the most wanted, not Sonic. XD Also Tommy, those relationship lists violate Wiki standards for many reasons. It's useless data to the majority of people, and lists like that aren't allowed. It's totally unencyclopedic.GrandMasterGalvatron 16:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy, you were told to stop, and you haven't. Not only are your edits AGAINST THE RULES, you're also THREATENING people. You're not allowed to do that, especially considering that YOU are making the edits. Sonic X is not the Sonic games, there's a reason for the Sonic X part of those sections! Sonic X.com or whatever is an official source, but NOT for the games, and you can't just say Knuckles is the most popular character, that's YOUR opinion, we simply list the FACT: Sega held a poll, and Knuckles came in third for most popular, it's just that simple. Now, onto your commenting. You are NOT ALLOWED to threaten people like that. YOU cannot get someone banned, and someone isn't going to get banned for OBEYING the rules, YOU are for NOT obeying them. And even then, if somebody makes an unconstructive edit and is punished, they are not instantly banned, they're temporarily unable to edit, for a period of time. Now, stop it, and obey Wikipedia's rules. -Chao9999 23:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Sonic and the Secret Rings, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Will 20:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Space Colony ARK

An article that you have been involved in editing, Space Colony ARK, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Colony ARK. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]