User talk:tomchen1989/Archive2015

Nomination of Xtreme Mod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xtreme Mod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtreme Mod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 07:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorting Icon WW2 casualties

Please check what you are doing. The notes are sorted with the figures in the table. Thank you--Woogie10w (talk) 09:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC) It makes logical sense to sort the main table, however the USSR should not be sorted because it does not work properly , the sort includes the descriptions as well as the figures. Later today when I am on my desktop I will fix this. Please check this sort and see the results, it does not appear professional--Woogie10w (talk) 13:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I fixed problem. There is no need to sort the Third Reich and USSR border changes. The main table and the USSR republics are sortable. When you make an edit check the results to see if it appears to be logical--Woogie10w (talk) 13:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the tutorial on the Wiki style--Woogie10w (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

I'll skip the Java for now, I am trying to learn Chinese. Regards--Woogie10w (talk) 14:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Tom, IMO it is not necessary to sort the Third Reich and USSR because the purpose of the schedules is to illustrate the components of German and Soviet casualties. The simple one line descriptions "Germany" and the "USSR" are misleading because borders changed during the war. A sort does not have an significance in this case. Regards --Woogie10w (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tomchen1989/Archive2015. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 02:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Johann Pachelbel images

Hey Tomchen1989. I have updated all four Commons images (1, 2, 3, 4) with explicit discussion of the false association issue. Anyone who uses them hereafter for the composer will have failed to read the pages. I will also be dropping some type of message at all other language Wikipedias.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)